- Joined
- Oct 18, 2017
- Messages
- 3,285
- Reaction score
- 1,886
This fight doesn't have near the aura that the first two did, that's for sure.
Thats for sure. We will be so thirsty for a major fight by then that this will still sell well though.This fight doesn't have near the aura that the first two did, that's for sure.
Yeah, come to think of it you're probably right.Thats for sure. We will be so thirsty for a major fight by then that this will still sell well though.
Wilder's been said to box like an amateur, but amateurs don't make the mistakes Wilder makes. Wilder's technique is nonexistent.
Fury is mma
Wilder is soon to unofficially be 0-3 against Fury.
If I made this thread I would have been handed exactly that ,instead I actually make logical ones and bring in facts and get warned for them because I back anything I post up as solid reasoning ,see this if I made this thread it would have to be obviously trolling and would do a far better job selling it then the OP to . <45>Biggest fight in history?!?
lol on point. <45>Wilder got this. He just needs to build up his legs a bit better for his costume. Like wear it to the mall and stuff to get more used to it.
Wasn't aware this was a 90's era amateur bout where fights were scored by counting punches. Two KDs puts Fury down 4 points alone. I don't care if you think Fury won, but it wasn't as one sided as people make it out to be.
Honestly, I think the sport has it right for the most part. I think the system we have now gives all styles a legitimate shot at winning.Anyone who watched 90's amateur boxing: What a bunch of boring shit. This is ruining the sport!
When their favorite fighter doesn't win: You know, this whole point scoring thing has some merit.
The last thing people actually want are fights being scored solely based on glove contact. We want a system that prefers knockdowns. If we want exciting bouts, anyway.