- Joined
- Nov 23, 2019
- Messages
- 31,218
- Reaction score
- 64,335
I agree there’s a difference between fighting a long ago former champs whose career is on a death spiral, but that’s not what we’re talking about here.Beating former UFC champs, who none of which were still in the UFC shouldn't carry much weight. There's a HUGE difference between beating a former UFC champ who's still a top contender in the UFC. And beating a former UFC champ who's no longer in the UFC and on a rapid downward spiral. When ever has an ex-champ, still top level fighter in the UFC left the UFC to fight elsewhere? How about someone who's beaten the most current UFC champs?
Tim Sylvia, for example, was only 2 fights removed from being champ. And when the UFC had issues with Couture and wanted to crown an Interim champ. the fight they made was Sylvia vs Nog (someone else Fedor beat, twice). That was Sylvia’s fight just prior to the Fedor fight. When Fedor fought Sylvia, he was fighting one of the UFC’s top 3 heavyweights.
In Arlovski’s case, he was a bit further away from his title reign, but not on a spiral. He lost the title to Sylvia, rematched Sylvia and lost, then went on a streak in which he beat Marciano Cruz, Fabricio Werdum, Jake O’Brien, Ben Rothwell, and Roy Nelson. Then he fought Fedor. That’s a legit winning streak, and Arlovski was a top heavyweight.
I don’t think I know what you mean by “beating current UFC champs.” Once a fighter beats the current champ in their division, they become the current champ. How many more current champs can one beat? Unless you mean former champs who are still in the UFC, like when Jones beat Rampage or Machida. But the only distinction between those fights and the Sylvia/Arlovski fights is the org it took place in. And those fighters left the UFC specifically to fight Fedor. Couture was trying to do the same. They weren’t on skids, they weren’t cut.
Last edited: