1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

'Bigfoot' Silva eyeing a fight with Josh Barnett

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by pcbh, May 31, 2014.

  1. pcbh Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2014
    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.mmafighting.com/2014/5/28/5759116/with-suspension-almost-served-bigfoot-silva-eyeing-a-fight-with-josh

    As reported on UFC Tonight, Silva's manager Alex Davis says "Bigfoot" would like to meet Barnett when he comes back sometime in the fall. In reaching out to Barnett's camp for a response, Ariel Helwani was told by his manager Leland Lebarre that "Bigfoot" should be careful what he wishes for.

    "Josh sees no professional reason to fight Bigfoot," Lebarre said. "We don't have any issues with him, so if [Silva] really wants to do this, he really needs to think about it first. Because we won't take something like this lightly."
     
  2. Free_MMAson Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    10,737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    36.1455,-115.1815
    "Josh sees no professional reason to fight Bigfoot," Lebarre said. "We don't have any issues with him, so if [Silva] really wants to do this, he really needs to think about it first. Because we won't take something like this lightly."

    Huh?
     
  3. Terror Zone Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Messages:
    7,956
    Likes Received:
    0
    Isn't he supposed to be the one fighter who actually legitimately needed TRT?
     
  4. JKS 77+&--#rT....

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    60,316
    Likes Received:
    340
    Location:
    Toronto
    I don't get the words from his manager
     
  5. SimonNova Worship and forget

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    25,932
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Qc City
    Me neither, it makes zero sense.
     
  6. King Kong Bundy** Orange Belt

    Joined:
    May 19, 2014
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Milwaukee,Wisconsin
    dont understand a word of it.
     
  7. Keakecasacooway Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,730
    Likes Received:
    0

    lol what the hell is this?
     
  8. ShreddinMMA Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    18,289
    Likes Received:
    314
    Location:
    PNW
    Yeah I'm with the others. Don't understand what that is supposed to mean.

    But I do believe Barnett is a bad matchup for Bigfoot. His striking is much tighter, he's more powerful in the clinch, and I can't see Bigfoot doing shit to him on the ground.
     
  9. OverhandLoop Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Maine

    I'm guessing they're taking Bigfoot as making a personal threat towards them, and are insulted? Comes across a kind of silly.
     
  10. shonuf Titanium Belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    48,980
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe this could headline the SEP 13, 2014 Brazil card.

    After the fight Bigfoot will probably have to go back for more surgery on his pituitary glands/tumors.
     
  11. Namek Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Two cheaters fighting each other. Lets hope for a double KO.
     
  12. OverhandLoop Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,056
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Maine
    Pointless comment.
     
  13. OldWrestler Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2012
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ooohhh, don't the rattle the Warmaster's cage. It makes him cranky.
     
  14. Terror Zone Banned Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Messages:
    7,956
    Likes Received:
    0
    As pointless as it is accurate.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.