McCarthy would not dare take a point from Jon Jones.
It does not matter how many eye pokes occurred.
Different rules for different fighters.
I'm a huge Jones fan but you're dead right.
McCarthy would not dare take a point from Jon Jones.
It does not matter how many eye pokes occurred.
Different rules for different fighters.
Lmao....where's the gif of Big John picking up Pitbull like a Chihuahua
Stop complaining about Big John and realize he's the ref, he's the boss inside the ring or cage. Big John does his job better than any other ref. He establishes his presence in the cage and the fighters respect that. He gives fighters more chances on the ground whereas most refs would stand the fight up quickly. Big John dives in and risks getting hammered by a punch when a fighter is just about out whereas most refs try stopping the fight in other ways. Face the facts Big John is the best ref in MMA whereas Herb "Sleeping" Dean was just pathetic last night letting a fighter get choked for 7-8 seconds longer than he should've been.
no place for egos in officiating. the nba lets it go on and big john thinks he is the fricken mma rules god.
I thought he did fine and did things correctly.
I thought he did fine and did things correctly.
Even the casually stroll near the end after the nut shot on Strauss? I mean I don't think he was as bad as some folks are making him out to be...but you have to admit he dropped the ball not getting in there on that one.
Big John arguing "I never said that, did I?" with Strauss was embarrassing.
Just ref and shut up.
what do you mean by casual stroll?
I remember he got hit, he moved Pitbull, then talked to them both. I can't really remember what your reference is. I need a reminder.
He took his sweet time getting to the part where he moved Pitbull. Definitely wasn't in any hurry to stop the action when it was clear as day Pitbull was following up. I don't know how any can excuse that...the ref can't saunter over when he needs to break the fighters.
Agreed.
For some reason it seems some people always need something to bitch about.
Acting like it affected the finish is truly asinine, and just a sign that many fans in this sport can't accept an outcome. There was not a single foul that forced Strauss to go for a kimura with no guard.
Strauss and Pitbull had gone to absolute WAR for almost 20 minutes; then the guy who is winning takes a VICIOUS groin shot (much worse then anything he gave pitbull)
Acting like it might not have somehow affected the finish is just as asinine.
Strauss and Pitbull had gone to absolute WAR for almost 20 minutes; then the guy who is winning takes a VICIOUS groin shot (much worse then anything he gave pitbull) and eats a follow-up shot that could've been prevented. To top things off Big John lies and tells him it was just the foot that hit him when it was definitely his upper shin/lower knee and that he isn't taking a point.
There are so many ways this could've affected the fight it's crazy - not saying that Pitbull wouldn't have won anyways, but I don't remember Struass going for any subs prior to that, seemed like he had a physical/mental freakout and went for something he normally would never do, so who knows what part the groin shot played in that sequence.
Only fighters who have been in wars for 20 minutes and then eaten a savage groin shot have valid opinions on this subject, so when keyboard warriors interject that they know without a doubt that huge groin shot late in a fight that wasn't penalized didn't affect the outcome I can only shake my head
He took his sweet time getting to the part where he moved Pitbull. Definitely wasn't in any hurry to stop the action when it was clear as day Pitbull was following up. I don't know how any can excuse that...the ref can't saunter over when he needs to break the fighters.