Elections Biden Lies about NAACP Endorsement

But why didn’t those voters vote for him is the question? They could’ve easily voted for sanders but didn’t.

and you expect a candidate to win the presidency when he needs a watered down field to win lol. Come on Chris this is pure reddit nonsense.


Biden won states he spent $20
Campaigning in over sanders.

The trump path if you will
 
I think Biden could piss on the alamo, won't make any difference, Trump has blown it.
 
People choose Coca~Cola over Pepsi. It has nothing to do with marketing, companies just love to throw away money without any return on their investment.
Sanders outspent Biden and still lost......lol
 
It's well documented at this point that Biden lies early and often. Maybe he can lie again about participating in sit-ins again to protest segregation. Or lie again about being arrested in South Africa protesting the apartheid. Or lie again about planning a walkout at a restaurant for not serving his black classmate. Or lie again about marching at Selma during the civil rights movement.


 
Sanders outspent Biden and still lost......lol

not the point I was trying to make, maybe you didn’t understand it, but it does segue nicely into another layer of my point:
... Biden got as much coverage as every other democrat candidate combined. https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...as-every-other-democratic-candidate-combined/
AS did Clinton over Trump, but Trump still got more media coverage. https://qz.com/919887/donald-trump-...ord-800-million-in-earned-media-in-one-month/
Edit: and that doesn’t account for the narrative: Biden-good, Bernie -bad

Edit: what is with those attached files?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-5-23_12-36-36.jpeg
    upload_2020-5-23_12-36-36.jpeg
    22.8 KB · Views: 2
  • upload_2020-5-23_12-36-36.png
    upload_2020-5-23_12-36-36.png
    150.7 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
It's well documented at this point that Biden lies early and often. Maybe he can lie again about participating in sit-ins again to protest segregation. Or lie again about being arrested in South Africa protesting the apartheid. Or lie again about planning a walkout at a restaurant for not serving his black classmate. Or lie again about marching at Selma during the civil rights movement.




It seems like a reflex when he's put in an inconvenient situation. Like he just wants to wiggle his way out of it without meeting the criticisms head-on.

Just another attribute of his that's not going to allow him to shine over Donald Trump. He can't really pull the "you're a liar" card when he has been caught lying or spinning the truth several times.

At best he can say, "well, I don't lie as much", but that's not going to be overly convincing.
 
Do the donkeys really want to win? Self sabotage is real. Edgy Brah out.
 
All those voters across all
Those states could’ve easily voted for sanders but they didn’t. They voted for Joe instead. That’s no CT and had nothing to do when people dropped out. Those voters could’ve easily voted for sanders but they didn’t.
He's not saying they cheated Bernie, just that they were more inclined to defeat him than they are Trump.

A crowded field has advantages and disadvantages based on the candidate. Bernie's biggest problem has been a lack of attention or credit, low information voters which make up the majority don't take him seriously because the rare times he's mentioned is usually in a negative or even false light.

Bernie's strength is his tenacious focus on policy and his ability to communicate how that policy affects the average American citizen. Joe's weakness has been a lack of energy campaigning and weak debates where he can only ride the coattails of the former president without offering anything new.

So they pack the field up until Super Tuesday where the entire field drops and supports Joe who had performed terribly until that point. This gave Joe a huge surge of momentum with many low information voters flipping to him at the last minute. From there they at least at enough for a brokered convention and could continue the narrative that Joe is electable and Bernie isn't, which is a big deal for the people who just want Trump out of office.

As for motive, the DNC supports their establishment candidates and have burned Bernie in the past. If he won the nomination, Bernie would have cleaned house in the DNC and restructured it to be more progressive with like minded individuals. So if the DNC could get their guy in, they may lose to Trump but the status quo and their places of power remain and they stand a much greater chance of winning the next election without a real successor to Trump in the Republican party.
 
It seems like a reflex when he's put in an inconvenient situation. Like he just wants to wiggle his way out of it without meeting the criticisms head-on.

Just another attribute of his that's not going to allow him to shine over Donald Trump. He can't really pull the "you're a liar" card when he has been caught lying or spinning the truth several times.

At best he can say, "well, I don't lie as much", but that's not going to be overly convincing.

Is it though? He's done his fake war story numerous times at small, planned speeches despite being told numerous times by his staff it never happened. But it's cool because Joe didn't "believe" he lied about it and the message was essentially the same as what happened.

What pressure was he under when he lied that he got a full scholarship to law school and got 3 degrees in college (top of his class)?

What pressure was he under when he stole Neil Kinnock's speech and lied about his family to do so?


He has a long history of lying and it started far before his mental decline.
 
Is it though? He's done his fake war story numerous times at small, planned speeches despite being told numerous times by his staff it never happened. But it's cool because Joe didn't "believe" he lied about it and the message was essentially the same as what happened.

What pressure was he under when he lied that he got a full scholarship to law school and got 3 degrees in college (top of his class)?

What pressure was he under when he stole Neil Kinnock's speech and lied about his family to do so?


He has a long history of lying and it started far before his mental decline.

Atleast in that scenario, he obviously felt uncomfortable when somebody put him on the spot and asked the question about his academic record. He was obviously far from the best at his school (more like the bottom of the class) so he just started lying his ass off.

He's basically the stereotype of a career politician, whenever he feels insecure about his own record, he starts lying and making up bullshit.
 
Sure. Yet it appears to me that media manipulation had a role in which way the votes swung.
Agreed, this is what I’m saying and it’s not even controversial.
 
Atleast in that scenario, he obviously felt uncomfortable when somebody put him on the spot and asked the question about his academic record. He was obviously far from the best at his school (more like the bottom of the class) so he just started lying his ass off.

He's basically the stereotype of a career politician, whenever he feels insecure about his own record, he starts lying and making up bullshit.

Nah, he’s a pathological liar.

 
That hardly makes him the exception among career politicians.
No it doesn’t, but when you’re entire platform is based on a contrast in moral fiber, shades of gray is a pretty weak argument to make. His lying destroyed his campaign in the past, now it’s not even discussed. However, there was one candidate who was the exception to this age old rule stereotype, but alas that contrast was also ignored by the media.

Edit: and it goes to show that his lies are deliberate in nature, not some sort of political fight or flight response.
 
No it doesn’t, but when you’re entire platform is based on a contrast in moral fiber, shades of gray is a pretty weak argument to make. His lying destroyed his campaign in the past, now it’s not even discussed. However, there was one candidate who was the exception to this age old rule stereotype, but alas that contrast was also ignored by the media.

Edit: and it goes to show that his lies are deliberate in nature, not some sort of political fight or flight response.

It's not discussed now because the standing president is also a notorious liar (and despised by the media). Bernie got shafted, but everybody pretty much knew that going in, they had nothing on him outside of utterly false claims about mistreating women (a laugh considering Biden's own record) and fabricated BernieBros. I told people in 2016 already that he was going to be fucked in 2020 too. That's just how it goes. He doesn't have any connections, he doesn't have billions of dollars in the bank, and he doesn't have the right mentality to survive among the sharks.

Bernie was always too nice of a guy, he should've gone straight for the jugular and ripped this guy apart. Because it's so fucking easy to do it. But it's just not in his nature to do so.

Biden has deliberately misrepresented himself but from what I can see his most outrageous lies have occurred when he was put on the spot, and made to feel insecure. Whenever the question of race comes up, he just starts lying his ass off. It's obviously a weak point of his. Probably plenty of stuff in his past that he doesn't want to be seen in the light of day. You can pretty much imagine how it was for the politicians who came up during the age of LBJ and Nixon.





 
Last edited:
He's not saying they cheated Bernie, just that they were more inclined to defeat him than they are Trump.

A crowded field has advantages and disadvantages based on the candidate. Bernie's biggest problem has been a lack of attention or credit, low information voters which make up the majority don't take him seriously because the rare times he's mentioned is usually in a negative or even false light.

Bernie's strength is his tenacious focus on policy and his ability to communicate how that policy affects the average American citizen. Joe's weakness has been a lack of energy campaigning and weak debates where he can only ride the coattails of the former president without offering anything new.

So they pack the field up until Super Tuesday where the entire field drops and supports Joe who had performed terribly until that point. This gave Joe a huge surge of momentum with many low information voters flipping to him at the last minute. From there they at least at enough for a brokered convention and could continue the narrative that Joe is electable and Bernie isn't, which is a big deal for the people who just want Trump out of office.

As for motive, the DNC supports their establishment candidates and have burned Bernie in the past. If he won the nomination, Bernie would have cleaned house in the DNC and restructured it to be more progressive with like minded individuals. So if the DNC could get their guy in, they may lose to Trump but the status quo and their places of power remain and they stand a much greater chance of winning the next election without a real successor to Trump in the Republican party.


So why didn’t the voters vote for him though?
 
So why didn’t the voters vote for him though?
Because most were low information voters whose main priority was to vote out Trump. You can argue policy but most voters on Super Tuesday had made their decisions only a couple days before voting. Bernie was relentless about the policies that were at the top of the polls of what people were hoping to see.

It was very strange for every previous winner or contender to drop just before the first meaningful election day and endorse a candidate. That wasn't because they were so devastated about losing South Carolina, it was a strategic move with the aim to knock Bernie out of reach. Gave Bernie no time to address Joe directly on policy, the damage was too much by the time he would have even had a chance to run a true 1 on 1 race.
 
Back
Top