Opinion Beyond Party Lines - Both Parties are Complicit to Attacking the American People

hedidhisownstunts said:
you think wishing death on the opposing thought is an exclusively Right event?
Click to expand...

He wasn't wishing death on those with opposing thoughts. He was expressing his indifference to the intentional destruction of the poorest and weakest members of society - regardless of their political affiliation.

(And ironically he was responding to the contention made in your OP, Einstein.)

Show me where this same position is being promoted by anyone on "the left".
 
Both parties are scumbags for the most part, I chuckle when I see people fighting and going to jail for these people who couldn’t care less about them. Politicians just have a job where their primary objective is to become richer and more powerful so they can leave a “legacy” (ego) period. It’s human nature, maybe If i held a position like that I’d be crooked and selfish as well. They don’t give a flying fuck about “ we the people” lol. And i don’t care about them because I know that I’m on my own. And it’s fine, I rather be this way....I worked all my life for my shit and I will keep on doing so regardless of who is president. I did well during Obama and I did ok during Trump. And whoever comes next, I will do my best to thrive. Do as you want but If I can give a suggestion is that you shouldn’t be too worried about who becomes president next, you will have to pay bills anyway lol.
 
Last edited:
There will be no worldwide depopulation of the weak, elderly or poor. There will simply be greater struggle.
 
Jo Jorgensen 2020
 
JudoThrowFiasco said:
Aww man, thanks! When the socialist left use that word to describe me it reaffirms I'm on the right path.

Appreciate it!
Click to expand...

Serious question:

If there were a sniper on the loose who was targeting and killing American billionaires and people on the left said they were "unperturbed" by it would you consider those leftists sociopathic?
 
ultramanhyata said:
He wasn't wishing death on those with opposing thoughts. He was expressing his indifference to the intentional destruction of the poorest and weakest members of society - regardless of their political affiliation.

(And ironically he was responding to the contention made in your OP, Einstein.)

Show me where this same position is being promoted by anyone on "the left".
Click to expand...
Intentional destruction and wishing death are synonymous to the extent of being implicit of one another. His indifference is characteristic of American Right wing politics as we see the Right turning their backs on the unemployed or immune-comprised working class and small business owners/contractors effected by their own pandemic legislation.
That is the biggest issue in my opinion incoming. But the focus on the left and democrat media is also somewhat indifferent seeming to this as well in that they are entirely preoccupied with identity politics trolling and an alliance with a group of people who generally don't even descend from slavery attacking people whose families didn't even live in this country when slavery existed over systemic racism residual from slavery.
 
ultramanhyata said:
Serious question:

If there were a sniper on the loose who was targeting and killing American billionaires and people on the left said they were "unperturbed" by it would you consider those leftists sociopathic?
Click to expand...

No. You can't deduce sociopathy from simply showing indifference to homicidal behavior. At best, it just shows apathy or lack of empathy which is one trait out of myriad -- and if people are honest about their apathy, that is anti sociopathic behavior as lying is another trait. I mean, i know you have the fantasy of assassinating rich people, this like the 5th post ive read from you that youve brought up; so its high up your fantasy list. I remember you setting the bar at 100 million -- but i wouldnt consider you a sociopath -- you dont have the talent to pull it off.

ultramanhyata said:
I'm surprised these sorts of attacks are as rare as they appear to be.

I would support a "terrorist" operation in which the world's richest people are targeted for assassination. We would go right down the list from number 1. Everyone with a net worth above 100 million would be in the cross hairs.

A person would remain under threat unless and until it was shown that a named percentage of their net worth had been liquidated and turned over to specified charitable organizations.

But instead we have a collection of nutters willing to sacrifice their lives in order to kill average joe's in malls and subway stations; those who have absolutely nothing to do with the current, global calamity. A pure waste of homicidal vengeance.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
JudoThrowFiasco said:
As for the destruction of the poor and weak. I honestly do not care.
Click to expand...

You should care. You need the poor and the weak. If not then you become the poor and the weak you just live a little better but instead of being poor, you are a slave.
 
Ready2Defend said:
I'm right wing but am no GOP loyalist. Like the Dems, they lost the plot a long time ago. Especially the neo-hawk types. I've voted Democrat and Independent before. I like Tulsi Gabbard.

But Trump is the clear choice for these times. I think history will vindicate tenure.
Click to expand...

People like you said the same thing early on about Bush Jr. History will vindicate him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,980
Messages
55,459,094
Members
174,787
Latest member
Freddie556

Share this page

Back
Top