BEWARE: Tricky old guys

what's with rourke switching stance a lot? i notice in orthodox his jab looked laboured and ineffective. inujury or something?
 
what's with rourke switching stance a lot? i notice in orthodox his jab looked laboured and ineffective. inujury or something?

Rourke switched stances because he could not because he should
 
Rourke switched stances because he could not because he should

that's precisely what i'm getting at. the fact he could against seymour just shows it was a waste of time instead of doing something else more productive. i'm struggling to find any benefit or advantage he got out of it.
 
he switches stance in order to set up his special move. he telegraphs it too much if you ask me
 
which is what? his ko shots were thrown from orthodox
 
he throws some kind of weak energy blast that is easily deflected by most of his opponents
 
Back
Top