Yes she is, and I vehemently disagree with it. I can't stress that enough, there's no way she should be working as a LEO. Unfortunately seemingly every department is understaffed and unable to find qualified hires. I know we're struggling with it out here.
We get lots of training on de-escelation, but you also need training in all areas. Yes, de-escalation is an area that many departments should clearly work on, I'm not disagreeing with that, but of late it has been a focus everywhere. Also, no matter how much training you have human error will still come into play. I can't sit here and say this woman had inadequate training because I don't know that for a fact. She might have had plenty of training and still fucked up. Is there any evidence that the local departments aren't getting de-escalation training? That this training is replacing de-escalation training?
As far as her being a murderer, you know that that's sensationalism or hyperbole on your end. There's no way what she did was premeditated, and a jury acquitted her of whatever manslaughter charge or whatever was brought against her. Now, I'm not saying that that's a great position to be in, but even murderers may have something worthwhile to teach in the aftermath of the horrific acts they have committed. I have a suspicion that you wouldn't be against others acquitted or even convicted of crimes having any sort of "platform."
I mean, yeah, I agree with you saying, "fuck her." But she's not even being paid to teach this course on a subject that you have to admit she is uniquely qualified for. There are justified shootings and it's extremely stressful to have to take a life, it's not a wholly useless training course.