Elections Beto absurd and unconstitutional gun confiscation plan summed up in an MSNBC interview...

LOL!! @luckyshot just said in another thread that Democrats don't want gun ban/confiscation they just want "baby steps" to make the US safer. DERP!
 
LOL!! @luckyshot just said in another thread that Democrats don't want gun ban/confiscation they just want "baby steps" to make the US safer. DERP!

They been saying that shit for decades. Just like they don't want open borders and socialism. Now suddenly they all act like it's a great thing and pretend like they and media haven't been attacking conservatives for years for stating the obvious.
 
Honestly props to Beto for at least being honest and transparent. He’s just saying what all Democrats want anyways the difference is he’s at least honest.
 
Honestly props to Beto for at least being honest and transparent. He’s just saying what all Democrats want anyways the difference is he’s at least honest.

He wasn't saying any of this shit when he was running for Senate in Texas. Not about gun rights, abortion or illegals. Not spewing this racism bs.

Hardly being honest, just pandering to a different audience.
 
Be done by those pollsters who had Hillary +22 or say people don't want a wall before Trump wins.

Polls are bullshit. People are more pro-gun rights than ever.

Pro gun and pro Military style weapons are different. I’m not really sure where I fall in this debate actually but I know that the founding fathers didn’t mean ak-47s when they wrote the constitution
 
Pro gun and pro Military style weapons are different. I’m not really sure where I fall in this debate actually but I know that the founding fathers didn’t mean ak-47s when they wrote the constitution
But when they wrote the Constitution the musket that the infantry used was the SAME musket hanging above the mantle and the ship with 50 cannons that Joe Blow owned was the same as the ship with 50 cannons that the Navy had....
 
"No one is coming for your guns silly paranoid fools"

7a7674e233b6cb7b30c9bf52a368cb8735fc795b.gif
That's Democrats 10 years ago saying Republicans accusing them of being socialists are liars.


 
"223 blows a hole out of you the size of an orange" and thus they should be illegal he says

Meanwhile this is the 2nd most common rifle round sold, a 30-06

223-30-061.jpg

(223, AR-15 most common round vs 30-06, most popular hunting round as I belive the 223 sales that defeat it are more commonly for target shooting than coyote or hog or whatever hunting)

His attempt at logic is just so baffling.

Source? Not that I don't believe you, it's just that I would think 30-30 or 7.62x39 or 7.62x51 would be ahead of aught six
 
Source? Not that I don't believe you, it's just that I would think 30-30 or 7.62x39 or 7.62x51 would be ahead of aught six

I did just go off my gut there and from hearing in the past 30-06 was the most popular hunting round before 223 took off.

I was close. It's #2 behind 223. 308 does beat it out

https://www.americanhunter.org/articles/2015/12/20/america-s-most-wanted-ammunition/

Here are Federal’s top sellers from 2014:

1. .223 Remington/5.56mm NATO
2. .308 Winchester/7.62x51mm NATO
3. .30-’06 Springfield
4. .30-30 Winchester
5. .270 Winchester
6. .243 Winchester
7. .300 Winchester Magnum
8. 7mm Remington Magnum
9. 7.62x39
10. .300 Winchester Short Magnum
11. .22-250 Remington
 
Remember Democrats do not want to come for your guns.

I need someone to clarify for me. In this video is he saying all semi-automatic rifles will be illegal or just AR-15s and AK-47s?

If ALL semi-automatic rifles then would the bolt action AR-15 be legal?
pof-revolt-ar15-straight-pull-bolt-action-rifle-1404775-1.jpg


If just AR-15s and AK-47s then what about the
FN SCAR?
fnscar17sblack.jpg


Just to be clear I would start campaigning for Trumps dumbass if this asshat even stood a chance.
If you think what he is proposing is reasonable you are retarded. This is legislation talking points created by someone that knows nothing about guns.
 
Last edited:
Pro gun and pro Military style weapons are different. I’m not really sure where I fall in this debate actually but I know that the founding fathers didn’t mean ak-47s when they wrote the constitution

You mean the guys that just finished fighting a war? Those guys were the guys who didn't mean it? Maybe you can point me to the part of the Constitution that says "Shall not be infringed unless it's an AK47"? Is that next to the part where Letters of Marque are?
 
Yes. An AR-10. But the vast majority are .223.
No, AR-15s. I mean they are basically the same anyways so its semantics but yes they do have AR-15 in 7.62. Other than that you are correct most are in .223. I'm just nitpicking.
 
No, AR-15s. I mean they are basically the same anyways so its semantics but yes they do have AR-15 in 7.62. Other than that you are correct most are in .223. I'm just nitpicking.

Yes. You can get a custom build or buy it in a hundred different calibers, but when people are talking about AR-15's, they are almost always in reference to the standard .223. I don't know what the actual percentage is, but I don't know anyone with a 7x62 AR-15. AR-10's are pretty rare too, at least in my experience.
 
Isn't this exactly what the Christchurch shooter said in his manifesto?
That the left would arrive at the point were they would try and take the guns away and that this would naturally trigger a second civil war?
And that in this civil war whites would get some sorta racial awakening and unite around that? o_O
 


He's the dimwitted Cory Booker (The actual groper) essentially saying the same thing, but calling people pointing out that Democrats want to confiscate guns, which is what he's saying demagogues and fearmongering.
 
Back
Top