- Joined
- Oct 9, 2012
- Messages
- 15,182
- Reaction score
- 2,087
well, looks like I don't have the discipline to leave it aloneWell him not losing and being P4p on the top lists in boxing, and breaking the all time record is not an opinion. Thats the evidence I used in my argument.
Losing is the only thing you have against Pac (and that was once against a legend in Morales), and that's only because he faced elite competition. Floyd was only #1 p4p between 2005 and 2007 and started being p4p in 2002 (Pac following up in 2003). (if Ring rankings are to be trusted), and Pacqiao won fighter of the year three times as opposed to PBF's 1. P4P is subjective too, so it doesn't really matter that much. Also, last I checked, Pac has belts in 8 divisions, a record that Floyd lacks.
You just kicked yourself there buddy
How?
Also Pac can have the decade while people are talking about Floyd being the best of all time. I think "all time" is a little more prestigious than a decade. Thats my opinion
you're right, all time? decade, but I thought we were arguing about who had the better decade this whole time. Doesn't matter though, I think Pac's career is better overall anyhow
responses are in the quote.
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_Pound_For_Pound--2000s
Last edited: