D
Deleted member 465145
Guest
This is simply untrue. Edson is a better all-around striker, he has more weapons and is more technical than Conor. To pretend that one or the other has not been at least mildly tested is inaccurate. And can we PLEASE avoid treading into "visions of grandeur" territory? That is a whole thing that needs not be touchedWho has Khabib even fought is a better Question. Why would you bet the house on an untested wrestler who has visions of grandeur about his striking during fights??
Betting the house is as bad a decision as having your dad in your corner.