- Joined
- Apr 15, 2014
- Messages
- 14,495
- Reaction score
- 3,138
Denway>Murka
thats what i'm saying, we can't ruin this shit quick enough
Denway>Murka
He pulled in another large stadium in LA. I really don't like how negative the latimes is being on bernie's chances though. Hilary has been dipping and bernie has been inching up. Plus, it's still early. Anyway, his biggest problem still seems to be name recognition. I plan on doing my part where I live to raise awareness in black communities as that appears to be the biggest group that hasn't heard of him.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-sanders-california-20150811-story.html#page=1
I want a democratic system that limits his power.
If Sanders were to win, the structure that would limit his power would be corporate-influenced.
thats what i'm saying, we can't ruin this shit quick enough
I think the bigger problem--from the perspective of those of us who, for example, oppose upward redistribution of wealth or are concerned about the degradation of the environment--is that a very large portion of the population has different goals. Republicans have disproportionate power in gov't because of their geographical dispersion patterns. And even on those issues that have bigger public support than governmental support (for example higher MW and higher taxes on the rich), the problem isn't big money causing politicians to change their minds--it's elected officials tending to be rich themselves before running for office and many voters not placing a high priority on those issues (to be blunt, a lot of people would slash themselves in the face with a razor if they thought it would hurt black people more than it hurts them).
Well supposedly its the constitution that limit his power if he ever become president but the left are more than happy to cross that line if that fit their goals
Agreed on most of this.
But I don't think the slash themselves crowd is really that big, to be honest. The notion of "get big money out of politics" is huge with just about everyone. From the most liberal lefty to the biggest right-winger, just about everyone wants politics to be more democratic and less influenced by moneyed interests.
I mean, Bernie is a big deal because he's the first non-corporate-sponsored candidate in the national spotlight in my lifetime and probably in the last several decades before that.
When a "real" democratic candidate comes by once every 50 years, it's hard for things to change.
I mean, Bernie is a big deal because he's the first non-corporate-sponsored candidate in the national spotlight in my lifetime and probably in the last several decades before that.
When a "real" democratic candidate comes by once every 50 years, it's hard for things to change.
But what I'm saying is that "money in politics" is a red herring. People blame that for not getting the results they want, but the real problem is that there are a lot of people who disagree with them (whoever "they" are). We don't have a consensus on what the problems or solutions are that's being blocked by "big money."
.
I agree. Bernie is like Nader - but with the political bona fides.