Stop reaching for your fallacy friends. I already gave you the definition in my last post. Stop being a hypocrite, a racist and a tough guy. You would lynch me but you don't even know what it is. You'll need some help with that if you actually read the definition I quoted. When you get a mob of friends to do that then knock on my door. I'll answer.
Provide some evidence to refute the statistics that I posted, which you labeled "hyperbole", or there's nothing to argue. If they're exaggerated then prove it. Why is this so hard for you? If you were as smart as you think you are then you would already have a legitimate counter-argument. Simply say that a large number of lynchings were not recorded, which is believed to be true, and you'll have something to bring to the debate. It's pretty sad that I have to leave the back door open and then tell you what your counter-argument should be.
Thats again where your wrong.
I said that my statement was hyperbole you fuckin dolt, not yours.
The conversation started with someone saying "we also live in an age where racism towards whites is fully acceptable...so yeah, there's that."
My reply "When they start hangin white people, then Ill believe you..."
That was the hyperbole statement.
Your reply was "Facts" about lynching from like 1871-1962 that shows 1 in 4 people lynched were white people.
You posted that as if i didn't believe that a white mans ever been lynched.
That's where you tried to derail the argument because whether a white mans been lynched or not has nothing to do with what me and Sivo were talking about.
Had I said "When they start refusing to serve the white man apple pie at the diner, then Ill believe you"
You wouldve posted a picture of a white man being refused service at a diner.
When blacks were lynched, it was mostly because they were black. If whites were lynched it was due to a mob action or a punishment of some sort. Different situations that still have no merit on what were talking about, but I still felt I had to clear that up.