- Joined
- Apr 1, 2007
- Messages
- 6,943
- Reaction score
- 673
Scripture doesn't tell us the Earth is 6,000 y/o...many theologians base this on genealogies recorded in Scripture...
This is an excerpt from an interesting article I read recently...
Let us start in the beginning with one male and one female. Now let us assume that they marry and have children and that their children marry and have children and so on. And let us assume that the population doubles every 150 years. Therefore, after 150 years there will be four people, after another 150 years there will be eight people, after another 150 years there will be sixteen people, and so on. It should be noted that this growth rate is actually very conservative. In reality, even with disease, famines, and natural disasters, the world population currently doubles every 40 years or so.
After 32 doublings, which is only 4,800 years, the world population would have reached almost 8.6 billion. That’s 2 billion more than the current population of 6.5 billion people, which was recorded by the U.S. Census Bureau on March 1, 2006. This simple calculation shows that starting with Adam and Eve and assuming the conservative growth rate previously mentioned, the current population can be reached well within 6,000 years.
Evolutionists are always telling us that humans have been around for hundreds of thousands of years. If we did assume that humans have been around for 50,000 years and if we were to use the calculations above, there would have been 332 doublings, and the world’s population would be a staggering figure—a one followed by 100 zeros; that is
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000.
Not sure you really aimed to reply to me.
Anyways, that is assuming nothing can affect the birthrate. In the times we live in we are already witnessing this in the western world. Whether this is due to education or multiples factors is hard to tell.
We also have mass extinctions from bad luck (shiiet asteroid), lack of technology (no antibiotics) or too much technology (shiiet A-bombs).
All I am saying is that assuming that population growth is as easy as a straight line like that would be a stretch in my humble opinion.