Yeah. Like Jury rarely does enough to really dominate a fight and Girtz will atleast come with volume.someone tell me why not to put 2u on Girtz against Jury, dude is a dog and the 3.00 odds looks pretty good.
Yeah. Like Jury rarely does enough to really dominate a fight and Girtz will atleast come with volume.
someone tell me why not to put 2u on Girtz against Jury, dude is a dog and the 3.00 odds looks pretty good.
Yeah I have been watching that line and wondering what I was missing. Girtz is a tough guy with good forward pressure . I think it is a case of the ex UFC fighter getting credit by the oddsmakers simply becuase of the brand recognition. Jury is somewhat of a known name whereas Girtz is just a Bellator grinder - at least from the perspective of the casual fans. Girtz is my only bet on this card.
Right bro u want to be in the ufc. When ur not then it’s basically just showing up for a payday. Ur not looking forward to your fight not even interested in it. Just doing it for money.Jury is technically better everywhere, but dude just looks disinterested in the cage. I also threw a small bet on Girtz +205. Can easily see him simply outworking Jury to a decision. That said, Jury is definitely the more talented fighter.