Social BDS/CDS mega thread

Oceanmachine said:
She isnt that bad.

Not all Dems are the same.
Click to expand...

Is there a bigger CCP shill than Nancy Pelosi?

bbj.jpg


p2.jpg

http://www.sfgate.com/news/amp/Feinstein-vs-Pelosi-Over-China-Issue-S-F-2977076.php
SF Chronicle said:
WASHINGTON -- Underscoring the great divide over U.S.-China policy, San Francisco's two most influential lawmakers in Washington are leading opposing sides as Congress prepares to vote today on China's trading status.

To Pelosi, it is reckless to grant full trading privileges to an oppressive state in the hope that it will translate into political freedom. "I don't believe in the concept of trickle-down liberty," she said yesterday in an interview. "Economic reform does not necessarily lead to political reform."

She also contends that China will never fully open its markets to U.S. goods unless it believes that Washington will retaliate for unfair trade practices, something she believes the United States has thus far shown little sign of doing.

The annual debate over China trade "has strengthened the administration's hand, increased its leverage" on such issues, Pelosi said. "The very fear of revocation has brought the Chinese to the negotiating table."
Click to expand...
p3.jpg

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Pelosi-on-China-A-voice-in-the-global-wilderness-3082494.php
SF Chronicle said:
CHINA -- It's not often that members of Congress find themselves running from police in foreign countries. But in September 1991, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, had slipped out of her Beijing hotel room, with reporters and a crowd of curious followers in tow, and gone without official permission to Tiananmen Square.

Along with two other members of Congress, Pelosi unwrapped a banner that read, "To those who died for democracy in China." The decidedly undiplomatic delegation was immediately surrounded by police and Chinese "tourists" who pulled walkie-talkies from their backpacks.

Anybody watching Pelosi since San Francisco voters elected her to Congress in 1987 could find dozens of deliberate anti-China incidents orchestrated by the 58-year-old mother of five. She keeps a photo from the 1991 visit, displaying it occasionally on the floor of Congress.

Pelosi has emerged as a leading critic of the Chinese regime and of her own president, who she says has a bankrupt policy toward China. More often than not, she finds herself on the outside while Bill Clinton dines on chilled lobster with Chinese President Jiang Zemin.

While fellow Bay Area resident Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein was hosting a 1997 Blair House reception for her "oldest friend in China" - Jiang - Pelosi was across the street at a protest denouncing him as a despot.

"What do they expect me to say?" Pelosi asked. "That it's not OK for a Republican president to coddle dictators, but it's OK for a Democrat?"
Click to expand...
p4.jpg

http://www.sfgate.com/politics/amp/Clinton-pushes-hard-for-China-to-join-WTO-3066678.php
SF Chronicle said:
WASHINGTON --The opponents Clinton mentions are not congressional Republicans, but some of his own party's leaders in Congress. Two of the strongest foes of permanent normal trade relations with China are House Democratic Minority Whip David Bonior, D-Mich., and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco. Pelosi has said she has no major problems with China's entering the World Trade Organization, where it will be subject to international rules on trade. But she opposes giving up the right of Congress to review the country's trade status with China on a yearly basis.

"We all agree that it would be better to have China inside the WTO, complying with the rules, rather than the status quo of China on the outside violating its agreements with the United States," Pelosi said. "To date, however, the Chinese government has consistently failed to honor its signed bilateral agreements on trade and its international covenants on the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and on human rights in China and Tibet. The Chinese government has no credibility and begs the question: Why should the United States grant permanent trade status on the basis of broken promises rather than proven performance?"
Click to expand...
p5.jpg

http://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-apr-20-oe-pelosi20-story.html
Nancy Pelosi said:
Today, President Bush will roll out the red carpet for Chinese President Hu Jintao, a leader whose government brutally crushes freedom, democracy and the religious expression of the Chinese and Tibetan people. Hu will receive the best welcome U.S. taxpayer money can buy, including full military honors and a 21-gun salute.

This is the same regime that provides military technologies to countries that threaten international security, including Iran and North Korea. The same regime that threatens Taiwan with a military attack, detains and tortures Chinese people for expressing their political and religious beliefs and arrests Tibetans for carrying a picture of the Dalai Lama.

While open dialogue is essential, many of us on both sides of the aisle in Congress oppose the celebratory nature of this official visit.

This is not about isolationism. We must have engagement with China, but it should be sustainable engagement that enables us to maintain our values, continue our economic growth and uphold our national security.

Our growing national debt to China is a national security issue. Countries such as China that own our debt will soon not only be making our toys, our clothes and our computers, they will be making our foreign policy.

U.S. policy toward China is ineffective in upholding the pillars of our foreign policy -- promoting democratic freedom, stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and growing our economy by promoting exports abroad. Instead, we have pursued trickle-down liberty -- promoting economic freedom first, assuming that political freedom will follow. Reality exposes this policy as the illusion it is.

Bush administration officials say they hope that China will become a “responsible stakeholder.” We should avoid wishful thinking. Beijing’s priority is regime security. Economic development, along with the harsh repression of its own citizens, are the means to maintain political power. Access to the U.S. market is central to Beijing’s strategy.

American access to the massive Chinese market is also essential, but our trade relationship has been a disaster. Despite more than a decade of concessions, the trade deficit with China has grown from $4 billion a year to more than $4 billion a week. China continues to manipulate its currency, making its exports cheaper and U.S. imports more expensive than they would be in free-market conditions.

Finally, members of Congress of both parties will be watching to see if Bush kowtows to Beijing in ways that threaten our long-standing commitment to Taiwan. The American people want the administration to show resolve in standing up to Beijing, to demonstrate that we believe that the Chinese people deserve freedom. Only then will we have the moral authority to speak out for freedom in other parts of the world.
Click to expand...
p1.jpg

p6.jpg

p7.jpg

p8.jpg


p9.jpg


Dear Chinese Government, The Democrats Won't Save You

5 November 2018

If Beijing thinks that a House flip on Tuesday is good news for them in this trade war with Trump, they are in for a rude awakening. Sorry, China, the Democrats won’t save you.

Here is what Pelosi thinks about China tariffs: “The report of the USTR investigation on China’s intellectual property theft is a good first step, but far more is need to confront the full range of China’s bad behavior. Beijing’s regulatory barriers, localization requirements, labor abuses, anticompetitive ‘Made in China 2025’ policy and many other unfair trade practices require a full and comprehensive response. The tariffs announced today should be used as a leverage point to negotiate more fair and open trade for U.S. products in China.”

This from a woman whose district in the state of California has seen a marked increase in trade with China. She both knows the economic benefit of China and the impact China trade has had on blue-collar labor, as well as on the intellectual property often created in the Bay Area she represents. It’s true that governors and business representatives like doing business with China, but Washington is another animal with quite a different mindset.

The Democrats Won't End Trump's China Trade War

2 January 2019

The Democrats take over the House of Representatives this week. The bulk of their power will be used to block Trump any which way. The one roadblock they won’t set up, however, is ending Trump’s trade war with China.

For starters, new House leader Nancy Pelosi is a China skeptic. It is unclear if any of her Bay Area constituents can flip her on this (NoDak: lmao). Pelosi was a critic of China’s joining the World Trade Organization - a move pushed by President Bill Clinton - and she thinks China is a headwind for American workers. Even before the ballots were counted in the midterm races on November 6, Reuters reported that the one thing Trump and a Pelosi-led House can agree on is beating up on China.




 
Wow, lots of SF news paper links, wonder if they are biased?

Color me shocked if a politician is 2 faced and presents optics, while doing something else.

Didn't she just make Swalwell head of the impeachment hearing?

I can literally show you a video of her objecting and election over electronic voting machines, and senators like Warren and Klobuchar arguing as recently as 2019 also. Even on her own youtube site. Warren and Klobbs letter on their senate sites.





Not to mention her covid policies and the salon. Supporting BLM.

Most 2 faced politician ever. As is Mitch.

edit: She literally even mentions all 3 phases of the process, not just the vote tallies themselves. Oh, lets look at the state farm video

edit: I assume you will tell me Nadler is the most straight laced politician too, someone who requested the pardon of an actual terrorist who tried to bomb the capitol. Ok, got it
 
Last edited:
Deorum said:
Is there a bigger CCP shill than Nancy Pelosi?

bbj.jpg


p2.jpg

http://www.sfgate.com/news/amp/Feinstein-vs-Pelosi-Over-China-Issue-S-F-2977076.php

p3.jpg

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Pelosi-on-China-A-voice-in-the-global-wilderness-3082494.php

p4.jpg

http://www.sfgate.com/politics/amp/Clinton-pushes-hard-for-China-to-join-WTO-3066678.php

p5.jpg

http://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-apr-20-oe-pelosi20-story.html

p1.jpg

p6.jpg

p7.jpg

p8.jpg


p9.jpg


Dear Chinese Government, The Democrats Won't Save You

5 November 2018

If Beijing thinks that a House flip on Tuesday is good news for them in this trade war with Trump, they are in for a rude awakening. Sorry, China, the Democrats won’t save you.

Here is what Pelosi thinks about China tariffs: “The report of the USTR investigation on China’s intellectual property theft is a good first step, but far more is need to confront the full range of China’s bad behavior. Beijing’s regulatory barriers, localization requirements, labor abuses, anticompetitive ‘Made in China 2025’ policy and many other unfair trade practices require a full and comprehensive response. The tariffs announced today should be used as a leverage point to negotiate more fair and open trade for U.S. products in China.”

This from a woman whose district in the state of California has seen a marked increase in trade with China. She both knows the economic benefit of China and the impact China trade has had on blue-collar labor, as well as on the intellectual property often created in the Bay Area she represents. It’s true that governors and business representatives like doing business with China, but Washington is another animal with quite a different mindset.

The Democrats Won't End Trump's China Trade War

2 January 2019

The Democrats take over the House of Representatives this week. The bulk of their power will be used to block Trump any which way. The one roadblock they won’t set up, however, is ending Trump’s trade war with China.

For starters, new House leader Nancy Pelosi is a China skeptic. It is unclear if any of her Bay Area constituents can flip her on this (NoDak: lmao). Pelosi was a critic of China’s joining the World Trade Organization - a move pushed by President Bill Clinton - and she thinks China is a headwind for American workers. Even before the ballots were counted in the midterm races on November 6, Reuters reported that the one thing Trump and a Pelosi-led House can agree on is beating up on China.




Click to expand...


Based on this id rather she be President then Biden. BUT Speaker of the House is powerful enough I guess to push for sanctions and stuff
 
Oceanmachine said:
Based on this id rather she be President then Biden. BUT Speaker of the House is powerful enough I guess to push for sanctions and stuff
Click to expand...

"Our growing national debt to China is a national security issue. Countries such as China that own our debt will soon not only be making our toys, our clothes and our computers, they will be making our foreign policy. We have pursued trickle-down liberty -- promoting economic freedom first, assuming that political freedom will follow. Reality exposes this policy as the illusion it is.

Administration officials say they hope that China will become a “responsible stakeholder.” We should avoid wishful thinking. Beijing’s priority is regime security. Economic development, along with the harsh repression of its own citizens, are the means to maintain political power. Access to the U.S. market is central to Beijing’s strategy.

American access to the massive Chinese market is also essential, but our trade relationship has been a disaster. Despite more than a decade of concessions, the trade deficit with China has grown from $4 billion a year to more than $4 billion a week. China continues to manipulate its currency, making its exports cheaper and U.S. imports more expensive than they would be in free-market conditions." ~ Nancy Pelosi, 10 BT (Before Trump), aka 2006
 
Deorum said:
"Our growing national debt to China is a national security issue. Countries such as China that own our debt will soon not only be making our toys, our clothes and our computers, they will be making our foreign policy. We have pursued trickle-down liberty -- promoting economic freedom first, assuming that political freedom will follow. Reality exposes this policy as the illusion it is.

Administration officials say they hope that China will become a “responsible stakeholder.” We should avoid wishful thinking. Beijing’s priority is regime security. Economic development, along with the harsh repression of its own citizens, are the means to maintain political power. Access to the U.S. market is central to Beijing’s strategy.

American access to the massive Chinese market is also essential, but our trade relationship has been a disaster. Despite more than a decade of concessions, the trade deficit with China has grown from $4 billion a year to more than $4 billion a week. China continues to manipulate its currency, making its exports cheaper and U.S. imports more expensive than they would be in free-market conditions." ~ Nancy Pelosi, 10 BT (Before Trump), aka 2006
Click to expand...

We have the advantage in war. Tbh that is the only way I think we win. They wont break up like the USSR so the best we can do if its not war its to heavily damage them from economic war EVEN if it hurts us badly and to have allies (EU) as a giant counter to them along with Japan. I think South Korea will be pro China eventually at least from the Koreans ive met they arent anti China and a lot are learning Mandarian
 
Pretty weird rhetoric from someone who should be asking for pardons, no? Pretty much cementing they are going to jail for inciting CTs and fake news, especially given the political climate at the moment. Is this a kamikaze some how?







 
cottagecheesefan said:
Wow, lots of SF news paper links, wonder if they are biased?
Click to expand...

They're her words and actions. She fought the Clinton Administration over China trade policy for his entire presidency, as well as cross-chamber colleagues like Feinstein for the last three decades. Is there a greater compliment than CCP state-run media calling you "vicious, malicious, despicable"? What an honor. It's icing on the gay wedding cake of her undisputed GOAT status as the most anti-CCP politician in American history, a virtual one woman army. God Bless Nancy Pelosi.
 
Oceanmachine said:
I think South Korea will be pro China eventually at least from the Koreans ive met they arent anti China and a lot are learning Mandarian
Click to expand...

South Korea is unabashedly ethnonationalist like most Asian countries. They flipped the fuck out over the government taking in 561 Yemeni refugees and placing them on the remote province island of Jeju in 2018. The country is also a major global player in industrial tech with Samsung and SK Hynix, they're staunchly protective over their IP and have too much to lose by jumping into bed with the CCP. And well, it kind of goes without saying South Korea isn't going to be forming any alliances with China so long as there are operational US military bases in the country.
 
Deorum said:
How are Japan and South Korea relations these days, @ElKarlo? :D
Click to expand...
Still bad. Korea decided to go after the comfort women thing again and go after Japanese Steel companies in Korea.
Japanese beer exports are almost zero to Korea
Thing is though outside of kimchi, K-POP and Samsung phones there’s basically no Korean products here. And in Korea outside of beer there’s few Japanese. They’re mad at each other and that’s just how it is
 
Good thing we have all these democrat politicians supporting supporting BLM, and lots of evidence of it, also inciting them, encouraging them, even bailing them out.

Good thing we also have precedent for snap impeechments.

Good thing we have FBI arresting BLM ORGANIZER, supported by big tech and CNN.

Good thing have Nadler asking for Pardon of know terrorist, ON THE CAPITAL, who is in charge of BLM.

All far more proof than a transcript of Trump that shows no incitement to violence. You don't have CNN and the like running video 24/7 of him inciting violence. Which they would be, if they had it.





 


Wow, just looked at whitehouse.gov, interesting developments

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-donald-j-trump-011421/

"United States military troops in Afghanistan are at a 19-year low. Likewise, Iraq and Syria are also at the lowest point in many years. I will always be committed to stopping the endless wars. It has been a great honor to rebuild our military and support our brave men and women in uniform. $2.5 trillion invested, including in beautiful new equipment—all made in the U.S.A."



Plus these crack downs on china



https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...uilty-to-lying-about-china-ties-idUSKBN29I345

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/14/us/nasa-scientist-guilty-chinese-program/index.html
 
Mike Lindell bless, I can sleep soundly, knowing our elections are in his big, strong hands. Mmmm. Add this with the time magazine article, I did see a thread on. You got all you need. Massive fraud and conspiracy.

https://rumble.com/vdlebn-mike-lind...g-election-fraud-and-the-theft-of-americ.html

Funny that as soon as Biden comes in, Iran is making nukes again, and China is flexing on Taiwan.

This aint over fellers. God bless the believers!

edit:

We didn't start the fire
It was always burning, since the world's been turning
We didn't start the fire
No, we didn't light it, but we tried to fight it
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,236,984
Messages
55,459,363
Members
174,787
Latest member
Freddie556

Share this page

Back
Top