- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 10,852
- Reaction score
- 0
Makes sense, you both have about the same IQ.
IQ? Sounds like something a poor person would say.
How many platinum albums has your record label put out?
IQ? Sounds like something a poor person would say.
How many platinum albums has your record label put out?
Nobody knows the names of any dead white kids, cause they arent plastered all over 24 hour news for weeks on end. So noone would get your jokes. Its funny that way isnt it. There are cases of cops shooting unarmed white kids too, but it just doesnt "sell" so we dont get their names, cause in the end their lives apparently dont matter, apparently only the BLM.
And how much is he worth now?
I'm pretty sure the Sanders campaign released their plan to deal with racial justice afterwards ans did at least one other candidate so in the end it worked.
Slaverys over bro. U cant just buy black ppl.
This is the shit im talking about folks.
His bail is $10mil so i guess hes worth that much
The bed rock principle of the #blacklivesmatter movement is that
what is "racial justice"?
Limiting injustice based on race.
That's pretty vague.
What u mean it doesnt sell?
Do black ppl run the news? Are the viewers mostly black?
Jon Stewart and Oreilly had an argument about white privilege, and Stewart asked him the question i always want to ask white ppl who think like u do.
"Why so defensive?"
No ones callin u a racist, all ppl are doing is pointing out things that happen to black ppl that wouldn't necessarily happen if they were white.
How is that hard to admit?
So is the term "foreign policy", doesn't mean there aren't specifics in there that need to be dealt with.
I understand why it seems that way but their contention is that its black lives that are most vulnerable and thus require special attention. The assumption is that other lives are already seen as important but its black lives that need to be affirmed to matter.
As far as them being divisive, I agree and I think that's something that applies to many young, leftists with a hyper focus on identity politics. I understand that white sensibilities should not be among the top priorities in this discussions but its important to try and build bridges too instead of constantly alienating others. This is why I think such movements can quickly become echo chambers and why they're vulnerable to fracturing; they only care to address voices that agree on certain major issue but because of their hyper focus on identity politics and their diverse make up you can quickly have different sub groups claiming they're not being represented and that's a dire accusation among these types.
But the difference is the police are actors of the state and tend to face few repercussions. When a black guy shoots another black guy and they know his name he tends to get arrested and locked up while cops get paid vacations.
yeah I'm not really sure there are problems that should or can be dealt with.
They've never said only black lives matter, they just want to focus on black lives because of a perceived injustice in the way police shootings of blacks are handled.It seems to me their motto is only black lives matter, at least while Bernie S is making a speech.
I don't think they're doomed, perhaps they can rise to the occassion and organized and present a unified message. They have released policy suggestions for instanceMakes sense. This "movement" is lacking: leadership, focus, a SOP, and unity. This makes it a jumbled mess that can't be taken seriously. Righteous anger is all good and even necessary but without conveying the message well, or offering solutions it looks like a temper tantrum.
Agreed. Like income inequality, police brutality and lack of accountability does seem to effect the black community disproportionately but its not necessarily only a race issue despite unfortunately being painted that way.This happens to white people as well. If Mike Brown would have been shot by a black cop nobody would even bat an eye. Including white supremacists.
When it comes to racial justice you mean? There most certainly are but I will say that movements like BLM are myopic and have their own agendas that seem impervious to evidence. We hear about how blacks are are only 13% of the population yet are roughly 30% of those shot by police and are more likely to be unarmed when shot by the police but that ignores the fact that blacks commit more violent crime in general and against the police.
Truthfully while I do see the constant mention of black on black crimes as a deflection I think at its roots the causes of that and the disproportionate police violence against blacks are the same. If these neighborhoods were safer you wouldn't need that extra police presence. To me its clear that these communities are still suffering from racist policies of the past like redlining and some current policies like the drug war. If you were to solve some of the key issues I think the violence by police against blacks would drop significantly
That said, in the interim I don't think its wrong to want to tackle police accountability as it effects these communities even if I don't always agree with the way a movement like BLM handles itself.