They should apply the ONE approach.
This. I hate this kind of rhetoric. "Ah, they won't fight well, they will die, blah blah blah...", fuck these people. They need to maintain their weight or be cut if they don't perform. If they want to die the problem is on them, fuck it.If a fighter cuts weight, it's their own damn decision. If you don't want to, moving up a class is always an option, with the exception of a select few. We don't need more regulations, and we don't need helicopter commissions trying to protect grown independent adults from themselves. Stupid fucking idea.
More testing and more regulation is never the answer, that leaves us with more failed tests, and more fights cancelled as a result.
This isn't horse racing, where being the lightest is always an advantage. In fighting you cut too much, your cardio can go to shit, your chin can soften up. I would say 95+% of fighters are already in the optimal weight class, where they have the best chance of winning. If a fighter and his team thinks he has a better chance of winning in a higher weight class, then they would go up.
Some people are better at cutting than others. Both because of experience and better prep and, but also different people's bodies just react differently.
Plus look at the extreme of both ends, Uno vs Tibau. A guy fighting at his walk around weight vs a guy cutting a ton. Looked like a dude vs his dad.
That's why everyone has to cut. If you don't, your opponent will.
I agree, it might take some time for them all to get used to it, but every fighter will fall in line in a fairly short time, because who doesn't will start loosing big time against much fitter and stronger fighters.
Every athleet in the world tries to get as fit and strong as possible, but in the fightgame they do the worst possible thing a person can do to his body, 1 day before they have to achieve the biggest thing in their carreer( wich the current fight always is) and expect to perform, while the simple truth is, every fighter is better without loosing weight.
The fact that a few will try to cut weight anyway ( for a little while) and die is their own dumb fault and they don't need to be protected, in fact the world would be better of without such idiots anyway.
I'm still trying to understand it from a logic point of view.
Pretty much everyone cuts weight, today, right?
So the difference between 2 fighters cutting weight is probably like 2-3 lbs or something? let's say sometimes one fighter cuts 20 and the other cuts 15, for the same fight.
Is the 5lbs difference in cutting that much better compared to if the same fighter didn't have to cut weight and fought at his natural weight?
DOes that (to me, subjectively?) small difference really make me fight better than if I fought at the weight I'm used to, without having to go through such, dehydrating, process?
Can anyone offer some knowledge on this?
To be honest with you it can really vary depending on the fighter and circumstances. Before with IVs guys could rehydrate more quickly, so being the guy that could cut the most water weight was a big advantage.Yeah, I understand that part.
THere are times where the difference is extreme, but isn't that rare to happen?
And is that difference, that...advantage in weight really that much better compared to not having to cut at all, be healthy and fight as the weight you're used to?
I'm genuinely asking, not saying how it is, btw.
Maybe I should rephrase my question.
Let's say I'm a fighter, walking weight 170.
A) I cut 15 lbs, regain X amount back and fight around 170, having 5 lbs weight advantage, but had to de and rehydrate.
B) I don't cut at all, maybe like a pound or two, just to be sure, I don't have a 5lbs advantage, but I didn't have to dehydrate and rehydrate at all.
Is the situation A *that* much better for me, as a fighter? *scratches his head*
Your weight is submitted weekly to the UFC and whenever USADA tests you. Whatever this number is the weight you will fight at period, no exceptions. If you lose or gain weight via diet, then you can change weight classes, but dehydration would be banned 100%. Fights are made based upon the current ranges. 136-146, 146-156, etc. At this point, everybody cuts weight and it only hurts the fighters performances.
Instead of rewarding fighters who dehydrate themselves to near death, the weight class structures should reward the fighters who stay lean and in-shape year round. Get too big and you are forced to move up. The fighters who manage their weight properly should be rewarded with better performances. We should see the best fight the best, not who can cut the most weight without killing themselves. There is no reason why Max should be fighting Frankie, or Cejudo fighting Moraes, etc.
Most fighters would be fighting the same pool of fighters, and the outliers would be reshuffled to their proper weight class.
Anyone who says cutting weight has zero effect on their performance are just lying to themselves. We have seen numerous examples who fighters moving up and looking much better even if they have to fight bigger fighters. Imagine the performances if they didn't have to cut weight.
To be honest with you it can really vary depending on the fighter and circumstances. Before with IVs guys could rehydrate more quickly, so being the guy that could cut the most water weight was a big advantage.
But now with the IV ban, it seems like cutting a huge amount isn't as much of an advantage as it used to be. And some guys can do big cuts their entire career just fine, then others start to have a hard time as they get older. Most notably Ian McCall got to the point that he couldn't make weight without some mysterious illness or injury.
Just follow the ONE protocol. The solution is there....
Move everyone up a weight class and measure hydration levels. Welterweight becomes 185. Lightweight becomes 170. Featherweight becomes 155 etc etc.