With both belts being arguably the most important belt in MMA right now (Other than MW), I want to get my facts straight. What is the distinction between the two? Nate put two criteria down in stone: A) You cant be no new flash in the pan off the street, you gotta be a man with longevity at the top level B) You come to fight, you don't come hold. All-Violence, I believe the current champ is either Poirier, or Khabib. Not sure. But if you don't need to beat the person who holds the belt, then the belt belongs to Tony. And my interpretation is the All-Violence champ must never waiver from the tactics of pressure and damage.