Bad news: the average American woman now weighs 166.2 lbs.

Or maybe some dudes just don't like fatties. That pic at 162 lbs and 5'6" is seriously gross. Honestly, I'd say that you probably just don't get hot chicks if you're claiming that pic is actually attractive.

In fact, none of those chicks are hot.

There is no pic thats 162 and 5'6".

Where did I claim any of them were hot? They're normal, which is the whole point. People in this thread seem to think the women in the TS photo are representative as 160, which they're clearly aren't. While I'm sure you're bringing home 10's every weekend, those pics are not at all indicative of what I'd call fat unless porn was my barometer.
 
So, in no way, shape, or form is this news that we should be excited about, but - not having examined the data - I should point out that the results could have easily been interpreted or misinterpreted to benefit an agenda.

With weight especially, the mean is the least dependable tool to make a general claim. Outliers can only skew an average way, way up.

Let's say 4 woman are 125lbs and a 5th, as a reasonable outlier, weighs 250lbs. I could easily make her far heavier without being all that fantastic, but the outlier here will increase the average of the 4 women by 25 lbs. To bring the average of the 4 normal women down an equal 25 lbs, I would need the 5th to be an imaginary 0 lb woman.

A grotesquely overweight 500 lb lady (which exist) averaged with a grotesquely underweight 80 lb woman (which are less common than their counterpart) average out to two 290lb behemoths.

So you really need the median or mode to make better claims here.
 
So, in no way, shape, or form is this news that we should be excited about, but - not having examined the data - I should point out that the results could have easily been interpreted or misinterpreted to benefit an agenda.

With weight especially, the mean is the least dependable tool to make a general claim. Outliers can only skew an average way, way up.

Let's say 4 woman are 125lbs and a 5th, as a reasonable outlier, weighs 250lbs. I could easily make her far heavier without being all that fantastic, but the outlier here will increase the average of the 4 women by 25 lbs. To bring the average of the 4 normal women down an equal 25 lbs, I would need the 5th to be an imaginary 0 lb woman.

A grotesquely overweight 500 lb lady (which exist) averaged with a grotesquely underweight 80 lb woman (which are less common than their counterpart) average out to two 290lb behemoths.

So you really need the median or mode to make better claims here.

We already went over all of this.

Do you even read through sixteen pages of months old threads, bro?
 
You dudes who are willing to bang these fatties (looking at you Jack Handy) are the problem. Quit enabling these land whales.
 
We already went over all of this.

Do you even read through sixteen pages of months old threads, bro?

I actually considered that I may have personally made the point already - I know I have in the past - but was far too lazy to double check.
 
This chick is 5'5"the Murican average.

tumblr_m5483aFpQ71qhfudxo1_1280.jpg
 
I actually considered that I may have personally made the point already - I know I have in the past - but was far too lazy to double check.

Too lazy to use search thread function, spends minutes writing posts instead. Legit.:)
 
There is no pic thats 162 and 5'6".

Where did I claim any of them were hot? They're normal, which is the whole point. People in this thread seem to think the women in the TS photo are representative as 160, which they're clearly aren't.

Did you even look at the links you provided? The very first link is a women at 5'6" and 165 lbs. Lol, it says it right on the pic dude.
 
That will fly in America since you dont have public healthcare but in Mexico we have public healthcare, and the first thing a doctor will do is to get your BMI and put you on a diet if they see you have are fat.

Guess what, they dont give a fuck, they will save up money to buy trash food which is extremely overpriced since the government put massive taxes on it like they did with tobacco in order to make the population slim down.

And this is statistical, the massive junk food and soft drink taxes just reduced its consumption by 1%, poor people saved money and cut other things to get their junk food, that shit is addictive.

Wait, so you're saying that poor Mexicans have the know-how of nutrition and health but just choose not to follow them?

I find that extremely hard to believe because 1) Mexico is still a 3rd world country. Whatever public healthcare exists there, it's not going to cover lifestyle things that people even in developed countries can't deal with. I mean, the UK is right behind the US in obesity and they're a rich country WITH public healthcare

And 2) I work in public health and education among largely Mexican immigrants and guess what, they're as ignorant about diet and health as you'd expect them to be. I know they don't have the know-how because I see it every day.
 
Fat is your body's primary fuel source. Carbs are broken down into glycogen and glucose, which in turns is your source for ATP re-uptake and short term anaerobic fuel.

You misunderstand biochemistry.

I'm a huge bro, man. I know my macros.

The fact is, the vast, vast majority of obese people have poor diets, taking way too many calories. Specifically, they double or triple the appropriate amount of carbs and fat that a healthy person should be taking in.
 
Did you even look at the links you provided? The very first link is a women at 5'6" and 165 lbs. Lol, it says it right on the pic dude.

Yes, I saw that it had a different number than you stated and said as much. And you're correcting me by pointing out that I'm right.

This is going poorly for you so far, Don Juan.
 
There is no pic thats 162 and 5'6".

Where did I claim any of them were hot? They're normal, which is the whole point. People in this thread seem to think the women in the TS photo are representative as 160, which they're clearly aren't. While I'm sure you're bringing home 10's every weekend, those pics are not at all indicative of what I'd call fat unless porn was my barometer.

I strongly disagree. I consider all of those chicks fat. And whether someone is bringing home 10's or not has nothing to do with the discussion. The thing is, plenty of fit chicks aren't actually attractive. This is a thread on obesity, not how many hot chicks I bang.
 
I like my chicks with some meat on them so I'm ok with this. Everytime I bang a skinny chick and I go doggy style and their asses can be so small and flat sometimes it's unattractive. With a thick girl though she has a big ass from the back though so I feel like I'm with a real women. I guess I need a skinny chick with a big ass and that would solve all the problems.
 
I strongly disagree. I consider all of those chicks fat. And whether someone is bringing home 10's or not has nothing to do with the discussion. The thing is, plenty of fit chicks aren't actually attractive. This is a thread on obesity, not how many hot chicks I bang.


Would you consider those women "obese"?
 
okay so I want to get a consensus

4'11 to 5'2 150+ pounds is "doable"

5'3 to 5'6 170+ pounds is "doable /thick"

5'7 to 6'0 200+ pounds is doable/ a challenge

6'1 to 6'11 250+ pounds is a woman with unreal genetic breeding potential/would/happily

so I think it's fair to say we and by we I mean sherdoggers should only consider 4'2 to 4'9 250+ pounds undoable....unless she's got a huge rack? agree, disagree, thoughts?
 
Back
Top