- Joined
- Nov 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,263
- Reaction score
- 256
I don’t see how it hurts their brand. If anything they should see increased sales from people unaware they aren’t affiliated
Can you blame a fashion brand that doesn't want to be mistakenly associated with Reebok apparel and UFC fight kits?
We??? You work for Reebok or the UFC?Jokes aside, they are probably hoping that we will buy them out.
Nobody is going to confuse that brand with Reebok athletic gear.
I haven't seen a trademark suit this frivolous since Spike Lee sued Spike TV.
Bad news!?
Who the fuck actually buys these ‘kits’ lol
They sell stuff with "McGregor" in big letters written over it. Reebok wants to sell stuff with "McGregor" in big letters written over it.
No reasonable person is going to confuse the two.
If Reebok started selling Conor McGregor-branded blazers and wingtips, then you'd have an argument.
How does a company get a copyright over a guy's ability to use his own name to begin with? Only in communist Europe!
So can anyone who's named Mcdonald open a restaurant named McDonald's and start serving burgers?
I don't understand the legal rationale here... by this logic couldn't any clothing company block sales of any athletic attire, including jerseys, where the player's last name is the same as the name of the company? There's gotta be hundreds of possible examples of this... can anybody explain it to me?