International At least 26 tourists killed by suspected militants in Kashmir attack

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Silver
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
10,101
Reaction score
12,763
Group of gunmen open fire on holidaymakers in Indian-controlled region in midst of US vice-president’s visit to country

Aakash Hassan in Delhi and Peter Beaumont

At least 26 tourists have been killed and ten injured after suspected militants opened fire at a popular local tourist destination in Kashmir during a scheduled four-day visit to the country by the US president JD Vance.

Most of the victims were Indian, although two foreign nationals were also reportedly among the dead.
pic-1-6-1745335001.webp

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.indiatvnews.com%2Fjammu-and-kashmir%2Fterror-strikes-mini-switzerland-deadly-attack-in-baisaran-valley-a-beloved-tourist-heaven-in-kashmir-2025-04-22-986806&psig=AOvVaw1E-1FeeYBdjpY4WnYZPVho&ust=1745447751384000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBgQjhxqFwoTCNjzlqba7IwDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAE
The attack occurred in the Baisaran Valley, a picturesque meadow in Pahalgam, a well-known tourist town located 30 miles south-east of Srinagar, the region’s main city, in what officials are describing as the deadliest attack on civilians in the region in recent years.

At about 3pm local time, a group of gunmen, who apparently approached tourists from the direction of the nearby mountains, emerged from a dense pine forest.

Graphic videos shared by locals on social media showed injured tourists lying in pools of blood, while their relatives screamed and pleaded for help. Due to the area’s lack of road access, helicopter services were deployed to evacuate the wounded.

Describing the scene, a local tour guide told the AFP news agency he reached the scene after hearing gunfire and transported some of the wounded away on horseback.

“I saw a few men lying on the ground looking like they were dead,” said Waheed, who gave only one name.
42422485031_57b6e20702_z.jpg

A female survivor told the PTI news agency: “My husband was shot in the head while seven others were also injured in the attack.”

Omar Abdullah, the region’s top elected official, wrote on social media: “This attack is much larger than anything we’ve seen directed at civilians in recent years.”

Government officials said the dead included tourists from the Indian states of Karnataka, Odisha and Gujarat and two foreign nationals. At least six others were wounded.

India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, decried the “heinous act” cut short a visit to Saudi Arabia.

“Those behind this heinous act will be brought to justice ... they will not be spared. Their evil agenda will never succeed. Our resolve to fight terrorism is unshakable and will only grow stronger,” said Modi, who met with Vance the day before.

Donald Trump expressed his “full support” to India in a call with Modi late on Tuesday, Delhi’s foreign ministry said.
42864494912_37af86a25a_z.jpg

The scene of the attack was cordoned off as police launched an operation to track down the attackers.

According to local police officials, two to three gunmen opened indiscriminate fire on tourists in the area, which is accessible only by foot or on horseback, before fleeing the scene.

A witness speaking to India Today said: “The shooting occurred right in front of us. At first we thought it was just firecrackers, but when we heard others screaming we rushed out of there to save ourselves.”

Another witness, who also did not reveal his name, said: “We didn’t stop running for 4km … I’m still trembling.”

Protests erupted in several areas of the Indian-administered Kashmir condemning the attack, with a rally led by rightwing vigilantes in the city of Jammu blaming Pakistan.

A militant group identifying itself as “Kashmir Resistance” has claimed responsibility for the attack in a social media message. The group cited anger over Indian settlement of over 85,000 “outsiders”, which it said was driving a “demographic change” in the region.
40718916044_92c3416771_w.jpg


The mountain region is claimed in full but ruled in part by both India and Pakistan, and has been riven by militant violence since the start of an anti-Indian insurgency in 1989.

Tens of thousands of people have been killed, although violence has tapered off in recent years.

India revoked Kashmir’s special status as an autonomous state in 2019, splitting the state into two federally administered territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.

Who controls Kashmir?

The region in the foothills of the Himalayas has been under dispute since India and Pakistan came into being in 1947.

Both claim it in full, but each controls a section of the territory, separated by one of the world's most heavily militarised borders: the "line of control" based on a ceasefire border established after a 1947-48 war. China controls another part in the east.

India and Pakistan have gone to war a further two times over Kashmir, most recently in 1999. Artillery, mortar and small arms fire are still frequently exchanged.

How did the dispute start?

After the partition of colonial India in 1947, small, semi-autonomous "princely states" across the subcontinent were being folded into India or Pakistan. The ruler of Kashmir dithered over which to join until tribal fighters entered from Pakistan intent on taking the region for Islamabad.

Kashmir asked Delhi for assistance, signing a treaty of accession in exchange for the intervention of Indian troops, who fought the Pakistanis to the modern-day line of control.

In 1948, the UN security council called for a referendum in Kashmir to determine which country the region would join or whether it would become an independent state. The referendum has never been held.

In its 1950 constitution, India granted Kashmir a large measure of independence. But since then it has eroded some of that autonomy and repeatedly intervened to rig elections and dismiss and jail democratically elected leaders.

What was Kashmir’s special status?

Kashmir’s special status, given in exchange for joining the Indian union, had been in place since 14 May 1954. Under article 370, the state was given a separate constitution, a flag, and autonomy over all matters except for foreign affairs and defence.

An additional provision, article 35a, prevented people from outside the state buying land in the territory. Many Kashmiris believed this was crucial to protecting the demography of the Muslim-majority state and its way of life.

The ruling Bharatiya Janata party repeatedly promised to scrap such rules, a long-term demand of its Hindu nationalist support base. But analysts warned doing so would almost certainly ignite unrest.

On Wednesday 31 October 2019, the government formally revoked Kashmir’s special status. The government argued that the provision had only ever been intended to be temporary and that scrapping it would boost investment in Kashmir. Critics, however, said the move would escalate tensions with Pakistan – which quickly called India’s actions illegal – and fuel resentment in Kashmir, where there is an insurgency against Indian rule.

What do the militants want?

There has been an armed insurgency against Indian rule over its section of Kashmir for the past three decades. Indian soldiers and Pakistan-backed guerrillas fought a war rife with accusations of torture, forced disappearances and extra-judicial killing.

Until 2004, the militancy was made up largely of Pakistani and Afghan fighters. Since then, especially after protests were quashed with extreme force in 2016, locals have made up a growing share of the anti-India fighters.

For Indians, control of Kashmir – part of the country’s only Muslim-majority state – has been proof of its commitment to religious pluralism. For Pakistan, a state founded as a homeland for south Asian Muslims, it is the last occupied home of its co-religionists.


Michael Safi and Rebecca Ratcliffe

This also allowed local authorities to issue domicile rights to outsiders, allowing them to get jobs and buy land in the territory.

Authorities have described the attack as targeted and intended to spread terror among the tourists visiting Kashmir.

Tuesday’s attack seems to be a major shift in the regional conflict where tourists for many years have largely been spared from violence despite a spate of targeted killings of Hindus, including immigrant workers from Indian states, after New Delhi ended the region’s semi-autonomy in 2019 and drastically curbed dissent, civil liberties and media freedoms.

The Baisaran area attracts tens of thousands of Indian tourists daily, especially during the summer months, when temperatures in mainland India soar.

Indian army and paramilitary forces have been deployed to the area to search for the attackers. In recent years, militants have increasingly targeted security forces in the region’s mountainous and forested areas.

Kashmir remains one of the most heavily militarised zones in the world and is claimed in full by both India and Pakistan, although each controls only a part. The two countries have fought multiple wars over the region.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...lled-by-suspected-militants-in-kashmir-attack
 
At least 100 Christians were murdered in Nigeria during the Easter.

26 tourists murdered in Kashmir.

4,660 miles from Nigeria to Kashmir, yet one common denominator. Muslim attackers.
 
Last edited:
Reddit is unhinged as fuck. The top thread in this topic is just making jokes about Cances ugly ass. I get making jokes about the pope, at least he was old as shit and died of natural causes. This is just sad.

Atheists which are the majority of the left will take any opportunity to mock Christianity while defending Islam.
 
At least 100 Christians were murdered in Nigeria during the Easter.

26 tourists murdered in Kashmir.

4,660 miles from Nigeria to Kashmir, yet one common denominator. Muslim attackers.
Like I said in the Pope thread: We need a Pope Urban II. Reconquista 2 Islamic Boogaloo in Europe 1st. Once it's stable, unite the Orthodox and the Catholics.
 

Kashmir attack sparks fear of fresh conflict between India and Pakistan​

Penelope MacRae in Delhi

Tensions rise between nuclear-armed neighbours who have fought three wars over territory as Delhi vows to respond

The brutal militant attack that killed 26 people in one of Kashmir’s most scenic spots has shattered the region’s relative calm, turning a popular tourist destination into a scene of horror – and raising fears of a fresh conflict between nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan.

Soon after the attack in which gunmen emerged from dense pine woods and opened fire on families picnicking and riding ponies, India’s defence minister, Rajnath Singh, vowed a “loud and clear response”.


A little-known outfit called the Resistance Front claimed responsibility for the attack, but India believes the group to be a proxy for the Lashkar-e-Taiba terror group or another Pakistan-based faction. Pakistan denies backing insurgents, but says it supports Kashmiri calls for self-determination.

The massacre has reignited tensions between the two neighbours, which have fought three wars over the disputed Muslim-majority territory and come close to conflict several times.


An Indian security analyst who asked not to be named said the attack came a week after Pakistan’s army chief, Gen Asim Munir, described Kashmir as Pakistan’s “jugular” and promised not to “leave our Kashmiri brothers in their heroic struggle”.

“This is a very pivotal moment for the region. We have two nuclear-armed neighbours staring at each other,” said the US foreign policy author and South Asia expert Michael Kugelman. “All bets could be off.”

Among its first retaliatory moves, India announced the expulsion of the Pakistan high commission’s defence, navy and air advisers; the closure of a critical border trading point; and – for the first time – the suspension of the crucial Indus waters treaty.

The treaty governs the shared waters of one of the world’s biggest river systems that affects millions of lives in both countries, and India has never previously put the deal “in abeyance” – even in times of open conflict between the two neighbours.

But if the terrorists hoped the assault would win support from Kashmiris or revive separatist sentiment, they miscalculated: more than a dozen Kashmiri groups staged a complete shutdown of stores and businesses to mourn the victims, while local people held protest marches chanting: “Tourists are our lives.”

“Kashmiris are genuinely appalled,” said Siddiq Wahid, a professor in the department of international relations at Shiv Nadar University.

Militant violence has plagued Kashmir, claimed by both Hindu-majority India and Islamic Pakistan, since an anti-Indian insurgency began in 1989.


Thousands have been killed, although violence has tapered off in recent years.

In a controversial move in 2019, Narendra Modi’s government revoked Jammu and Kashmir’s semi-autonomous constitutional status, splitting the state into two federally governed territories. The government, known for its embrace of a Hindu-first political agenda, also allowed non-local land ownership to further integrate Kashmir with the rest of India.

The security clampdown reduced militant activity and tourism surged – a record 3.5 million people visited the Kashmir valley in 2024. Modi has framed Kashmir’s “normalisation” as a political triumph, saying firm action resolved the separatist issue and made the snow-capped, lush region “open for business”, although there is some local resentment at the heavy militarisation.

“Unfortunately, this attack punctures the government’s narrative that things are ‘normal’,” said another Indian security analyst who also requested anonymity.

Modi’s swift return from an official visit to Saudi Arabia signals the government’s determination to respond. Pressure is mounting for a strong response to the daylight attack in a heavily militarised zone.

Delhi may opt for cross-border strikes, as it did after the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing that killed 40 Indian paramilitary troops, analysts said.

But this time, the victims were not soldiers or security personnel, making the situation even more politically charged.

“India cannot twiddle its thumbs. Once the escalatory ladder is revved up, it can go out of hand,” said the security analyst. “You cannot read Modi, you can’t predict the man. He is very muscular,” he added.

What heightens the political dynamics of the Kashmir attack is the timing – during a high-level US visit. The US vice- president, JD Vance, on his first official trip to India, emphasised strengthening defence ties and praised India as a strategic partner.

In 2002, India and Pakistan came very close to full-scale war after a terrorist attack on the Indian parliament in December 2001 that New Delhi blamed on Pakistan-based militant groups. The US played a key diplomatic role in de-escalating the crisis.

“The messaging we are seeing from senior officials points to the US being fully behind India – and that it would not stand in the way of how India will respond,” Kugelman said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...-of-fresh-conflict-between-india-and-pakistan
 
Can't say I'm surprised, considering that the same government that fund these terrorist organizations happen to be the same one that sheltered Osama bin Laden and kept mum about it from the US. Fuck these Islamic terrorists.
 
- I read this message in the morning. Would be hilarous if they meet a woman as their maker:D
As an agnostic it could very well be a female. We'll never know until it's dirtnap time.

With captured terrorists/insurgents in Afghanistan we did use female interrogators. Apparently it was a way to "break them down" and let them understand they no longer call the shots.
 
The CIA rates India and Pakistan as the two countries most likely to use nuclear weapons on each other.

Apparently, they came very close after Pakistan trained and funded the terrorists who carried out the Mumbai Attacks, that left 200 innocent people dead. Senior Indian government ministers were calling for a full scale invasion of Pakistan, and had to be talked down by Indian Army Generals, who pointed out that would inevitably lead to parts of both countries glowing in the dark... :eek:
 
As an agnostic it could very well be a female. We'll never know until it's dirtnap time.

With captured terrorists/insurgents in Afghanistan we did use female interrogators. Apparently it was a way to "break them down" and let them understand they no longer call the shots.
- It's they have so little respect to womans in some of those contries, that would end being a ultimate joke.

Even Hulk and Juggernaut are broke by woman:D
 
Pakistan is free to bus in Pakis from other parts of the country, I guess they know India is the one place that can beat them in a population contest. Well, besides their old buddies Bangladesh.
 
The CIA rates India and Pakistan as the two countries most likely to use nuclear weapons on each other.

Apparently, they came very close after Pakistan trained and funded the terrorists who carried out the Mumbai Attacks, that left 200 innocent people dead. Senior Indian government ministers were calling for a full scale invasion of Pakistan, and had to be talked down by Indian Army Generals, who pointed out that would inevitably lead to parts of both countries glowing in the dark... :eek:

Hmm. So you've got one country with the highest consanguinity rate in the world and with the majority of its population that adhere to a religion that's known for promoting violence on one hand and the country with the highest percentage of vegetarians and believe in a religion that promotes nonviolence, righteous living, truthful, peace, karma and all that stuff on the other...

I wonder which of the two is more likely to be the aggressor?
 
Back
Top