- Joined
- Dec 26, 2018
- Messages
- 1,694
- Reaction score
- 1
Because he might get charged with terrorism, and win a terrorist prize?
By this metric China would be terrorists for pulling out of the US economy and devaluing the yuan.
Sound logic there.
Because he might get charged with terrorism, and win a terrorist prize?
I never said that it was doing fine. That's especifically what I wrote:No Argentinian president has ever received a pristine country, even the Kirchners came into power after the Menem disaster.
You said specifically that Macri was doing "fine" and that he was improving the country, and he did neither, and thus he is paying for it.
He should had prioritized fiscal and macroeconomic stability over all.
The economy was slowly recovering under Macri.
Like Trump?
Taj Mahal inspire allot of confidence?
Which multiple sources confirm. It's a fact.
You are taking only one indicator to judge the whole economy? That's laughable. Come back after you attend some Economy classes.It wasnt recovering.
Recovering would implies that damage was being reversed, the fact remains that debt was piling upon debt.
https://www.ceicdata.com/en/indicator/argentina/government-debt--of-nominal-gdp
You are taking only one indicator to judge the whole economy? That's laughable. Come back after you attend some Economy classes.
Considering this is a currency crisis triggered by a sovereign debt crisis then yes, its the most important indicator.
But we can also go for inflation.
Argentina is basically Greece, but without the EU to bail them out.
now it would be a good reason wouldnt it? Dollar to ARS increase in your favor. Not bad for everyone.This is crazy, i was just recommending Argentina to a friend as a vacation option.
The people touting "recovery" under Macri seem to value deregulation, privatisation and trade liberalisation as ends in themselves.
Except nothing of that happened under Macri either.
Are they wrong? They are touting his removal of export duties, import authorisations, foreign exchange controls and his pension reform (I thought that was privatisation, but maybe it was something else).
Wrong how? Argentine is a pretty closed economy even under Macri.
Just because he was a little more flexible than his predecesor doesnt makes him an example of the failure of liberalization when the country wasnt liberalized.
The foreign exchange control was pretty much unsustainable and he still borrowed a lot to pay up for deficits.
Well they (mostly the CFR) talked about Macri's "economic recovery" mostly in terms of those neoliberal policies and "gradualism".
It mostly seems like the "recovery' they refer to is those changes in themselves.
Trump cant do anywhere near as much damage as the rulers of third world countries with less institutional strenght can do.
Also as long as the US dollar remains the world currency, its not like people can do away with the US financial system.
By this metric China would be terrorists for pulling out of the US economy and devaluing the yuan.
Sound logic there.
But they arent neoliberal policies, they were just less shittier closed economy policies.
Argentina ranks 149 out of 180 in terms of economic freedom.
https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking
And is still considered a frontier market by most investment rating agencies.
By recovery i presume is that Argentina started to look more like an emergent market under Macri, but this crisis just proves its not and with Peronism its definitively going backwards.