- Joined
- Feb 1, 2009
- Messages
- 42,989
- Reaction score
- 10,478
Nope. Never was. Sorry.
How would you know if they were all killed? There certainly are species that existed that we haven't found yet.
Nope. Never was. Sorry.
True....but
If you took all 6 billion of us and put us in the square miles available in Kansas every human being on this planet could live there in relative comfort.
I think that the good lord put more than enough space, and food for 20 billion humans. Only if we followed his rules of behavior,
eliminated country's and borders,
coexisted peacefully,
shared resources,
and above all treated each other with love and respect I could see it.
And since you took this to a more serious tone. I think it would be a great boon to humanity's eventual colonization of other planets if we had a Nikolai tesla or cloned Einstein ,or other once in ageneration genius level men of math, and science.
STERNLY THOUGHTFUL RESPONSE FORTH COMING GIVE ME A COUPLE HOURS MANG.All the ifs, could have, would have, possible are the reasons why most humans live their life like they are doing now.
If this tech was made possible, "they" will publicise that they will clone Testla/Einstein/Edison/Franklin. But what they will actually do is use the tech to make money. Human greed knows no boundaries. It's native to think that a tech like this which would probably cost upwards of trillions to R&D, will be use to make good to the overall human populations. It would be use to make quadrillion, sextillion and whatever shit that is higher than 20 zeros in their paycheck.
We ARE destroying our Planet Earth as we speak, as much as most people deny, why should we be given the chance to "colonise" another planet? We won't be doing shit but repeating the mistake of destroying the new ones we live in. Because by then, people will think that since we can "just live on another planet", why save?
I'm not at all against it. We should see how many Hitlers it takes to kill a T-Rex.
Clone away, but keep the human clones brainless so we can just use them and harvest their organs.
i dont think we have the nitrogen levels in our atmosphere to support some of the giant dinosaurs but i do love when science goes into a IDGAF mindset.
I don't really care. For people, nurture would most likely end up making them unrecognizable from who they were a clone of. Don't see the point beyond research.
Dinosaurs. Yes, on an island, but absolutely no flying or ocean species.
I don't really care. For people, nurture would most likely end up making them unrecognizable from who they were a clone of. Don't see the point beyond research.
Dinosaurs. Yes, on an island, but absolutely no flying or ocean species.
I died at bold lol
Flying chit and ocean shenanigans is where the man draws the line.
Lulz had
Life will find a way, and we'll end up with flying raptors and oceanic rexes.
Not in my lifetime.
That would take millions of years.
I'm trying to imagine the cosmic shitstorm it would take to let something like that be legal.
There are people out there bombing abortion clinics, I shudder to think what they'd do if anyone tried clone farms.
Yes but we would not be bringing them back to take over but to take part in our pleasure and fulfillment.No way. If it's extinct, it had its shot and missed. Game over. NEXT.
Finally a good thread topic, Jack. Props, sir.
This dude got arrested for trying to clone a woolly mammoth. Biggest scientific injustice ever, IMO.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwang_Woo-suk
I'd rather see a Moa brought back. Then I could finally full fill my dream of riding a big bird like a horse.
I want a unicorn so badly ): Have wanted one since I was a kid lolThey could clone some unicorns or giants when they find the fossils.