Are they comparable or is one even more effective than the other? I was originally going to buy dumbells and start from there but then I realized that weight dipping is easily accessible and easy to do without getting injured even if you get tired.
Are weight dips more effective for hypertrophy than dumbbells?
Sorry I meant dumbbell curlsWhat exercise is “dumbbells”?
Sorry I meant dumbbell curls
Dips and curls work completely different muscle groups. That's like asking if chest flys will make my back grow. You might need to take a crash course on anatomy and kinesiology.
I asked about hypertrophy in general, not the actual muscle groups for the different excersise
I asked about hypertrophy in general, not the actual muscle groups for the different excersise
I forgot I can't use sarcasm in spacetime threads.
Sorry everyone, I'll do better next time.
That wasn't sarcasm.
Prove it.
You're allowed to do more exercises than curls with a dumbbell, just a heads up.It's hard to be sarcastic when you're responding to straw men. My question is: does weight dip produce faster hypertrophy gains than dumbbell curls (assuming the weight is comparable).
Fucking LOLSorry I meant dumbbell curls
It's hard to be sarcastic when you're responding to straw men. My question is: does weight dip produce faster hypertrophy gains than dumbbell curls (assuming the weight is comparable).
Dips and weighted dips are excellent compound exercises. They are most comparable to other compound exercises like push ups/weighted push ups and bench press. I enjoyed doing weighted dips for a time and they had decent carryover to my bench press.
Dumbbell curls are an isolation exercise and targets primarily your biceps. Isolation exercises in general are significantly worse at building muscles because they recruit a far lower number of muscles in your body. So if you're asking in a vacuum which exercise recruits more muscles, it is definitely dips.
This is why people view exercises like squat and deadlift to be top choices.