Are there styles of wrestling that translate better to striking?

Started thinking about this after watching TJ Dillashaw and thinking about all the good freestyle wrestlers that turned out to be great, explosive strikers.

It's been said that certain styles of wrestling work better for wrestling in MMA. Some high level wrestlers never successfully make the transition to MMA, because their style doesn't work in MMA.

Interestingly, GSP has credited his karate for his great wrestling, particularly his double legs takedowns. This never made much sense to me, before I started to really work hard on double legs myself, coming from a striking background. The timing for diving in for a power double is sometimes similar to the timing when you want to leap in with punches.

So I'm wondering if we're starting to see the opposite of what GSP was talking about: wrestlers with a certain style who are able to apply their timing and footwork to become great strikers. I'm sure greco-roman vs freestyle has something to do with it, but it may also be more complex than that. It's also possible that my hypothesis is complete and utter horseshit, since I don't really know much about wrestling, nor what kind of style of wrestling the different UFC fighters had before they started striking.

Thoughts?

TL;DR: Do UFC wrestler-boxers with great footwork come from a similar style of wrestling, or did they just become good strikers because they are great athletes and work hard?

 

I think the 'sticky' type wrestlers like shields and askren have proven to be weaker strikers than the 'explosive' wrestlers like hendricks and koscheck.

 

jones doesn't ^^

 

Greco Roman is probably better than Freestyle.

Straight up stance
neutral head position
lots of clinching

 

Having good cardio and speed probably helps a lot. And being explosive helps too.
They became good because they are great athletes and work hard, like Demetrious Johnson.

The cool thing is, you can go back and watch the learning curve.
Watch TJ's or MM's earlier fights, and then watch them now. Very few guys improve that much over a relatively short time.

 

Ask here:

http://forums.sherdog.com/forums/f12/

You'll get shit if you ask anything in the heavies.

 

Greco-Roman is a such a huge part of MMA that all fighters spend a lot of time working on it.
I don't know if the Greco background is as big of an advantage as it used to be, with all the guys being proficient in it now.

Guys from the freestyle background would also train Greco and clinchwork, and they have some funky freestyle TD's.
Some of the quicker freestyle guys, like Frankie or MM, are VERY hard to clinch with, let alone lay a finger on.

 

Yeah, I thought about all the biggest greco names in the UFC. Couture, Sonnen, Hendo, Velasquez, Lindland... they're all fairly stationary strikers. They don't leap in and leap out.

Now, you could say that Jon Jones is an anomaly in the sense of being an exceptional striker from a greco background. But that's kind of wrong on two levels: first of all, many of those guys are underrated strikers or celebrated strikers. Second of all, I don't know that Jon Jones' style of striking is similar to what we're seeing from freestyle wrestlers in the UFC. He's actually somewhat stationary, especially in his last few matches. Yeah, he does a few superman punches, but you can't compare his style to, say, Rashad Evans' highly mobile style.

Cheers, will consider it.

 

people have a lot of styles of wrestling, just like how mike tyson, ali, foreman, rjj and mayweather all have different boxing styles

most wrestling takes place from here


so a lot of guys arent good at covering a lot of distance, they move their opponent around and set up shots so they only have to shoot from less than a foot away. some guys dont even shoot, they bulldoze their opponent, snap their head down or wait for the opponent to shoot and just counter

mma wrestlers who come from this style would be dan henderson, phil davis, mark munoz, matt hamill and vmat


other guys are "outside shooters" who are quick enough that they can shoot from beyond clinching range. this is usually when guys are faster but weaker than their opponents and dont want to get tied up in their opponents powerful grip. if anything, those guys probably translate to striking better because they have to leap from feet away and get there before their opponent can react. they also have to set up their attacks from feints and movement rather than just pushing their opponent into what they want.

they shoot from say out here


the takedowns look more like gsp, chael sonnen and cain velasquez

note: it gets a lot more complicated than t his, this difference is as basic as comparing brawling to finesse fighting.

some guys like myself are outside shooters but prefer to dive on ankles (like my user name, low single) rather than driving through double legs. some guys are fast but clinch so youll shoot and they'll take your back in like .01 seconds. this is just an overview

 

The funky takedowns usually aren't effective in MMA, and I also wouldn't consider Frankie/MM to be freestyle.

 

They WERE, but yea, now they are both excellent at everything in MMA and faster than everyone else.

I think some of the funky TD's are part of the future. Just wait and see.

 

another example, some people hit takedowns like this, where they used their speed to constantly circle behind their opponent so they dont directly go force vs force. a lightweight can takedown a heavyweight with this, because you cant power your way out of it, or even sprawl on them with your weight. conversely a heavyweight wouldnt be fast enough to circle behind a lightweight


someone who does techniques like that would most likely strike differently than someone who ragdolls guys like this

 

I have no striking experience but I imagine that it's difficult for a right-handed wrestler to either learn to box southpaw or shoot with his left foot forward. So based on that completely naive approach, I'd say Greco lends itself better to striking than freestyle or folkstyle.

 

Both have their strong points
But because free style takedowns are based on speed and explosion (ever see an effective sloow ankle pick/knee tap / double or single leg?) That's gonna prolly translate well to handspeed/ footwork
Greco takedowns come down to leverage/timing/pure strength more often than not
...That being said I'll take greco and the ability to control the clinch/dictate the pace/ and just generally rough a mfker up...over having a base that leaves you open to well timed strikes anytime you use it(more than a few examples of knees catching dudes shooting double legs....can't say the same about a hip toss or head throw)

 

A lot of people are making it like freestyle and folkstyle wrestlers don't know how to clinch, it's a big part of their game also. As far as Greco vs freestyle or folkstyle, these styles tend to produce much better athletes than Greco, a lot of guys go into Greco because they can't compete with higher levels of freestyle wrestlers. Hendo was a two time Olympian in Greco but would be remotely competitive with even lower level international freestyle wrestlers and he wasn't particularly good in folkstyle.

 

This is a very good. The wrestling style does matter on what kind of striker you will be.

Personally, i like the single and use plenty of Judo/Greco Roman for No Gi. I can do doubles from close range but you have to be very explosive, fast and committed to the double leg when you do shoot from the outside

 

Folkstyle wrestlers that have explosive singles and doubles seem to translate to striking better while guys who are better at riding are better at BJJ and/or GnP.

 

Good thread. Will bookmark.

I agree w/ lowsingle and NoBiasJustMMA.

I was a linebacker in college and wrestled. I had a pretty good double. I wa able to pick up striking fairly quickly, but I am still having a hard time w/ BJJ.

 

for what its worth, when i started getting my wrestling partners into MMA, they all said lyoto's striking style reminded them of my wrestling style. where i constantly use footwork and agility to avoid getting tangled in shit. people often complain that im not engaging enough

then as soon as i feel an opening i just explode trying many takedowns in a row, usually going for quick/low strength techniques or unorthodox techniques that they won't expect. diving on ankles, trying spinning arm drags and if it doesnt work out, i just get the fuck out of there and start over

like i would shoot a low single, and if they tried to forearm block my shoulder, i would just go for this (skip to 1:45)


so my striking style ended up looking like somewhere in between lyoto and vitor, just avoiding shit and attacking in big bursts. i think a ton of it has to do with how i wrestled. i just dont feel natural plodding forward or standing still

 

Well, some of you seem to be misunderstanding my point. You can say "Well, these wrestlers are more explosive, and these wrestlers rely more on balance and core strength" or whatever. But I'm not talking about their physical attributes, their speed or their leaping ability. I think it has to do much more with how you find your distance and timing, how you set up your attacks. If you're accustomed to shooting a double leg from the outside at a certain moment, this may translate well to leaping in with punches from the outside at a certain moment, and vice versa. Similarly, the ability to create angles may be a key factor, as someone has already pointed out.

It's more about distance, timing and positioning, the mental aspect, I think. How you play the game. I mean, sure, you have to train your muscles to react the way you want them to. You don't develop good footwork over night, you have to train to be nimble on your feet and switch directions quickly. But that part is more easily trained than the wrestling game that comes from 15 years of competition, I think.