G
Guestx
Guest
I just ran across the early reviews for Jupiter Ascending. 53 on Metacritic; 36% on RT. So it's not looking good for their new sci-fi epic. To be fair, some people DID like it. The highest scores on Metacritic are an 85 and an 83 so it's not a blowout. But most comments typically sound something like this:
"It's blandly, often listlessly bad, check-the-blockbuster-boxes bad, just-out-of-film-school-and-shopping-a-tentpole-screenplay bad."
Now all that's left to do is to see if audiences turn out. After all, it's the money that the studios care about. But if they don't, what then? What does this mean for the Wachowski's careers? I don't think talent is the problem (Cloud Atlas is CRIMINALLY underrated) but what these guys need right now is a HIT.
So to get back to the title of the thread, if this movie totally bombs at the box office. . . Are the Wachowski's done?
Sources:
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/jupiter-ascending
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/mobile/m/jupiter_ascending_2014/
"It's blandly, often listlessly bad, check-the-blockbuster-boxes bad, just-out-of-film-school-and-shopping-a-tentpole-screenplay bad."
Now all that's left to do is to see if audiences turn out. After all, it's the money that the studios care about. But if they don't, what then? What does this mean for the Wachowski's careers? I don't think talent is the problem (Cloud Atlas is CRIMINALLY underrated) but what these guys need right now is a HIT.
So to get back to the title of the thread, if this movie totally bombs at the box office. . . Are the Wachowski's done?
Sources:
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/jupiter-ascending
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/mobile/m/jupiter_ascending_2014/
Last edited by a moderator: