- Joined
- Dec 12, 2017
- Messages
- 6,593
- Reaction score
- 1
I'm not a big fan of AOC but god damn do I love this post. Tell em, girl. Use your own fucking money Besos, you bald cock sucker. Home run for AOC, IMO
How fitting you used a gif from Dumb and Dumber. I always think of that movie when I read yours and Alex's posts.
If they said no, which they did, they would have not had to pay out 3 Billion$ so they saved that money, and now Amazon is expanding anyway which means they are getting extra tax revenue.
I thought you right-wingers on here were supposed to be capitalistic geniuses?
Sadly we can’t burn it all to the ground huh? I guess you guys just think you have some Robin Hood mentality where you think you are fighting for the people and bashing “dem corporate cucks”
Right now, in this point in time, NY and it’s people lost a lot of money and opportunity that’s all there is to it
I can't tell if you're kidding or not. If not, it's truly unbelievable how you can confidently argue something you know less than nothing about. The tax INCENTIVE would have come out to $3 billion. That is, $3 billion less than the over $30 billion it would have been, which is still a gain of over $27 billion. They said no, so the city LOST $27 billion. Whatever paltry expansion in office space they're doing in manhattan now is sure as fuck not going to come out to the $27 billion already lost from blowing the HQ2 deal.
If a papa johns cashier doesn't take your $4 off coupon and you don't buy a pizza from them, the cashier didn't just make the company $4.
Yep. There becomes a point where you're giving ng away the store to move products. I think cities in general can and should be more careful.The same thing happens there's a bidding war for pro sports franchises to move to a particular city. The deals offered are usually so generous that they cancel out any financial benefit of the team moving into that area.
Look at how the Rams fucked St. Louis. They're still paying for the stadium, and all of the bondholders got screwed.
Dude I'm right wing and I think tax give aways are prostitution. They're awful. Cities ir what have you within the US should win business based on infrastructure, taxes and the make up of their citizens. Anything else is political back took nonsense that shouldn't be allowed.How fitting you used a gif from Dumb and Dumber. I always think of that movie when I read yours and Alex's posts.
If they said no, which they did, they would have not had to pay out 3 Billion$ so they saved that money, and now Amazon is expanding anyway which means they are getting extra tax revenue.
I thought you right-wingers on here were supposed to be capitalistic geniuses?
Quoting for prosperity
You like to throw around the word “idiot” a lot and you just exposed yourself. Again NY wasn’t saving or paying 3B, they were going to forgoe taxes they wouldn’t even get if Amazon wasn’t coming in the first place. I see you and she guevara share he same IQ. Sad
And they just got those taxes now without having to pay a dime...
Again are you sure you understand capitalism? Might wanna take Bezos dick out of your mouth beofre you reply.
It’s like arguing with dry wall. Oh well I tap out brah, enjoy ignorance
Hopefully this expands to cities subsidizing sports stadiums.
The owners of the teams that get the city or state to pay for the stadium, promise all this revenue to local businesses but it never pans out.
This is thread worthy, but got the dubs.
This is why modern monetary theory is gaining steam.
As much as I am concerned by our deficit spending, I'm not convinced it matters.
Current monetary theory is dead. The market is not working the way it is supposed to.
Trump economic adviser Larry Kudlow: Hats off to AOC, she 'nailed' her questions to Fed chair
By David Montanaro | Fox News
Continue Reading Below
Top White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow applauded Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Thursday for her questions to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell during a House hearing.
Speaking on "Fox & Friends," the National Economic Council director pointed out that it was Ocasio-Cortez that asked Powell about the Phillips Curve, which theorizes that as the unemployment rate falls, wages rise and thus, inflation accelerates.
Ocasio-Cortez stated to Powell that the theory "is no longer describing what is happening in today's economy," and the chairman agreed.
"It was Ms. AOC who asked him about the Phillips Curve. Why is rising growth and employment and low unemployment bad? Why does that cause inflation and higher interest rates? And Jay Powell said, 'Well you're right. That thing hasn't worked in decades.' Now, I got to give her high marks for that. She got that out of the chairman," Kudlow said
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...aoc-she-nailed-her-questions-to-fed-chair.amp
That article says nothing about Amazon adding jobs, or at least how many. All it says is that Amazon has increased its office space in Manhattan-- which isn't AOC's bloc. Meanwhile, the headquarters in her Queens district were canceled planned for Long Island City in that borough. You should have read the WSJ article:
This isn't a new project. It's just an expansion of a previous HQ in Manhattan. Amazon already previously said it would add to the 5,000 jobs that exist in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and Staten Island. So I wonder how many jobs are added by tripling the office space in a borough that already splits 5,000 jobs with two other boroughs. Conversely, the Queens HQ was going to support 50,000 jobs. Those all went to Virginia who did offer incentives.
https://nypost.com/2019/05/27/amazon-is-reportedly-eyeing-office-space-on-manhattans-west-side/
Amazon's expansion is undoubtedly the result of a booming economy including increased consumer spending (not just on electronics). It can't be unexpected that they will expand. The question is how many jobs does that expansion brings to Queens.
AOC is almost as dumb as the people who think she isn't dumb.
This is thread worthy, but got the dubs.
This is why modern monetary theory is gaining steam.
As much as I am concerned by our deficit spending, I'm not convinced it matters.
Current monetary theory is dead. The market is not working the way it is supposed to.
Trump economic adviser Larry Kudlow: Hats off to AOC, she 'nailed' her questions to Fed chair
By David Montanaro | Fox News
Continue Reading Below
Top White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow applauded Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Thursday for her questions to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell during a House hearing.
Speaking on "Fox & Friends," the National Economic Council director pointed out that it was Ocasio-Cortez that asked Powell about the Phillips Curve, which theorizes that as the unemployment rate falls, wages rise and thus, inflation accelerates.
Ocasio-Cortez stated to Powell that the theory "is no longer describing what is happening in today's economy," and the chairman agreed.
"It was Ms. AOC who asked him about the Phillips Curve. Why is rising growth and employment and low unemployment bad? Why does that cause inflation and higher interest rates? And Jay Powell said, 'Well you're right. That thing hasn't worked in decades.' Now, I got to give her high marks for that. She got that out of the chairman," Kudlow said
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tr...aoc-she-nailed-her-questions-to-fed-chair.amp
AOC isn’t dumb. Young and naive, but she’s apparently sharp. At least relative to most of her cohorts; there is no IQ test for that job.
On another note, once again we see Sherdog “conservatives” advocating for extensive corporate handouts as a recruitment tool. It’s unbelievable.
FYI, there have been extensive studies on these municipal and State handouts to recruit companies. It’s not a dark area. And guess what, folks? In the long run, the juice isn’t worth the squeeze. You gotta do s little more analysis than reading the number of jobs and saying “it’s so simple!” like Alex in this thread, who apparently is now quite in favor of socialism as long as it flows upwards.
The tax INCENTIVE would have come out to $3 billion. That is, $3 billion less than the over $30 billion it would have been, which is still a gain of over $27 billion. They said no, so the city LOST $27 billion. Whatever paltry expansion in office space they're doing in manhattan now is sure as fuck not going to come out to the $27 billion already lost from blowing the HQ2 deal.
If a papa johns cashier doesn't take your $4 off coupon and you don't buy a pizza from them, the cashier didn't just make the company $4.
It's like a chick who says if you take her to dinner, she'll sleep with you. You say "no" so she settles for giving you a bj anyway. Did you really lose in that scenario?