"Anyone who say Diaz got robbed needs an eye doctor" - signed indoctrinated youth

Scyther

Banned
Banned
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
7,274
Reaction score
1
You people do realize that the vast, vast majority of people are saying that Conor won the fight and he won clearly. That's been the case from the outset. So why the need to convince the few, almost non-existent if I'm honest, stragglers who don't agree?

It's simple the new bosses just like the old bosses control the MMA media and that means they get to set the narrative. And because this fight being perceived as a loss or a robbery via judges is bad for the image of one of their few mega stars they change the narrative.

Most people don't like going against the crowd so they'll just fall in line or stay silent. Others will just buy the propaganda and have their opinions changed over time. Then there are those who are biased or new to the sport who do not understand the intricacies of the rules.

What the people who repeat the "Conor clearly won" narrative don't understand is they're constantly preaching to the choir so their posts are quite perplexing because they have no real opposition, but the UFC narrative is so ingrained in them that they just repeat it anyways.
 
You had me and then lost me you conspiracy nutbag
 
gty_513971508_80269252.jpg



Nate still ahead by 0.5, and has only lost to the judges in fights vs Conor.

tumblr_miazecVM8q1r3ifxzo1_500.gif
 
More like they have killed too many Brain cells smoking what the Diaz bros
 
People keep saying it because there is a persistent sub section of Sherdoggers that will do ask kinds of mental gymnastics to hate on Conor and discredit his wins so they think these people need constant reminding of their folly.

No sane person scored that 2nd round for Nate. Anyone who says Nate deserved that round is one of two things, a McGregor hater or a complete noob that doesn't understand scoring in mma. Which are you?
 
Your whole anti establishment gimmick reeks of jobless stoner.

The world is flat
Dinosaurs didn't exist
Diaz beat Conor

Got it
 
You people do realize that the vast, vast majority of people are saying that Conor won the fight and he won clearly.
While Conor did win this is not why. That is actually a logical fallacy, an appeal to popularity. Conor won based on judging criteria, nothing else.
 
While Conor did win this is not why. That is actually a logical fallacy, an appeal to popularity. Conor won based on judging criteria, nothing else.
Connor won because he made hamburger meat out of nates face and leg, Diaz landed nothing but love taps, Diaz got dropped 3 times, Diaz had 6 take downs stuffed, etc
 
Connor is acting like he killed Nate for 5 rounds. ... with all this bs "the King is back" .... when he got a merely 48/47 and 47/47... come on ... pathetic!
Thanks to him. .. we have Woodleys and Alvarezes now .... talking shit... money... and claiming fights from nowhere. ..
I remember when Machida wanted to fight GSP. .... Dana said "from where the fkn hell did that come from? " ... i guess Dana used to deal a lot better with the bs these guys talk.... and Machida was a bigger draw than Woodley Will ever getse near to be...
 
Last edited:
It was a close fight.

I'll leave it at that.
 
Anyone who thought Nate won is a skinhead member of the Nazi SS. Crackheads yeh
 
Coming into another Diaz hate thread, and I"m fucking ready

SIZE]
 
Connor is acting like he killed Nate for 5 rounds. ... with all this bs "the King is back" .... when he got a merely 48/47 and 47/47... come on ... pathetic!

He won an absolute war. There is nothing pathetic about that. Not giving the respect he deserves is what's really pathetic.
 
While Conor did win this is not why. That is actually a logical fallacy, an appeal to popularity. Conor won based on judging criteria, nothing else.
How is that an appeal to popularity? I'm only pointing out that most people think that Conor won. Or at least that's what they're saying.
 
Back
Top