- Joined
- Apr 30, 2014
- Messages
- 1,639
- Reaction score
- 0
not anderson because he fell to the groundLike a boss... who was standing on wet spaghetti noodles for legs.
not anderson because he fell to the groundLike a boss... who was standing on wet spaghetti noodles for legs.
Most people thought Condit won that fight too. Just because the judges fucked that up doesnt mean they should fuck this up for the sake of consistency."His face was damaged from a knee he did not defend himself against" And this matters why? Last time I checked, it didn't matter to the opponent, the ref, or the judges if you did or didn't defend yourself from an attack.
I'll say it again and again, if Robbie Lawler beats Condit based on harder hitting and attempt to finish, then Anderson Silva should have won for the same reasons