- Joined
- Jul 27, 2015
- Messages
- 5,444
- Reaction score
- 6
So back in the 1990s, the triple homicide of three children rocked the West Memphis, Arkansas community. WMPD would go on and successfully prosecute three teenagers for the crime, basically alleging that they did it as a Satan worshipping sacrifice. HBO filmed the trial for the documentary Paradise Lost which ended up being very partial to the defendants and got the case quite a bit of notoriety.
After serving 18 years, the defendants (now widely know as the West Memphis 3 or WM3) were granted a retrial. Realistically, it would have been very very difficult for the state to present a solid case as a.) they barely had enough stuff to get the conviction in 1995 and b.) some prosecution witnesses had died or moved or forgotten, so it was going to be a bitch ass retrial for the state of Arkansas.
The two sides reached a compromise, where the WM3 submitted an Alford Plea and were released on time served. Taking an Alford Plea means you plead guilty by admitting that the state has enough evidence to convict you, but you keep the right to proclaim your innocence. By this time celebrities and HBO and the movie West of Memphis made this a high profile case and this ending was very unsatisfying for both sides.
WMPD's shitty ass investigation has not given us any answers, HBO has muddied the water by putting out heavily biased (they are teh innocent!!) docs, which in turn celebrities saw and then preached to their fans about (most notably Henry Rollins, Eddie Vedder and Stephen King).
So now when you meet someone who is vaguely familiar with the case, they usually are familiar with it because of the docs or their fave celebrity ranting about those poor innocent teenagers being railroaded by white trash cops, etc.
I'm 78% sure the WM3 are guilty, but I also don't think the state showed enough in court to have convicted them in the first place. Anybody have strong feelings either way about this case or some interesting original thoughts on the matter?
It's my favorite court case of all time, so if anyone else is into it, please share your ideas so we can discuss
After serving 18 years, the defendants (now widely know as the West Memphis 3 or WM3) were granted a retrial. Realistically, it would have been very very difficult for the state to present a solid case as a.) they barely had enough stuff to get the conviction in 1995 and b.) some prosecution witnesses had died or moved or forgotten, so it was going to be a bitch ass retrial for the state of Arkansas.
The two sides reached a compromise, where the WM3 submitted an Alford Plea and were released on time served. Taking an Alford Plea means you plead guilty by admitting that the state has enough evidence to convict you, but you keep the right to proclaim your innocence. By this time celebrities and HBO and the movie West of Memphis made this a high profile case and this ending was very unsatisfying for both sides.
WMPD's shitty ass investigation has not given us any answers, HBO has muddied the water by putting out heavily biased (they are teh innocent!!) docs, which in turn celebrities saw and then preached to their fans about (most notably Henry Rollins, Eddie Vedder and Stephen King).
So now when you meet someone who is vaguely familiar with the case, they usually are familiar with it because of the docs or their fave celebrity ranting about those poor innocent teenagers being railroaded by white trash cops, etc.
I'm 78% sure the WM3 are guilty, but I also don't think the state showed enough in court to have convicted them in the first place. Anybody have strong feelings either way about this case or some interesting original thoughts on the matter?
It's my favorite court case of all time, so if anyone else is into it, please share your ideas so we can discuss