Another White Phd Student/Faculty Pretending to be Black

Nah, you didn't. You didn't even reply to any of them.

What you call vague bullshit, I call specific examples of systemic racism being displayed in America by critical analysis by experts. Your inability to grasp any of what you failed to read isn't my issue, but yours entirely.

There are also policies discussed in nearly all of the included studies and analyses. You show you've got bumfuckin' nothing when you gotta go to the "liberal studies!" route when I brought studies from the NCSL, The Sentencing Project, the US Sentencing Commission, the AMA, and the NIH.

fucking lol, you are such a clown!!!

resorting to as hominem attacks and cursing in order to act tough just serve to weaken your argument my Slovak friend.
 
Why would a person with privilege pretend to be oppressed and potentially be hunted down by cops?
 
Vague nonsense? I brought you a raft of studies detailing specific policies. I think you were unwilling to read any of it because it'd show your assessments on these important issues are flat wrong.


Here are the studies on specific issues. I await no serious reply of any kind from you, much less a nuanced one.

Racial gerrymandering
https://www.ncsl.org/research/redis...supreme-court-the-most-significant-cases.aspx

https://theintercept.com/2019/09/23/gerrymandering-gop-west-virginia-florida-alabama/

Sentencing
https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/un-report-on-racial-disparities/

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ext=articles&usg=AOvVaw0mC68DbqGFvw6cm40JS1qx

https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/demographic-differences-sentencing

https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=270873

Policing Bias

https://www.apa.org/monitor/2016/12/cover-policing

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01846-z

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02601-9

Medical bias

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638275/

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03228-6

https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/how-we-fail-black-patients-pain


Predatory lending practices

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...context=pilr&usg=AOvVaw3XKe06pF9OjWLjYv8OLj6p

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ual_full.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1j3WiM1aoQZzgt8MTe6J6U

GOP purging voter rolls

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/voter-purge-rates-remain-high-analysis-finds

https://theintercept.com/2020/05/28/pennsylvania-voter-rolls-purge-judicial-watch/

https://www.apmreports.org/story/2019/10/29/georgia-voting-registration-records-removed

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...-purge-over-200-000-voters-wisconsin-n1109636

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ection-stacey-abrams-tony-evers-a9250461.html

Gerrymandering is pure politics. Nothing to do with racism.

Blacks do seem to be treated unfairly as it relates to sentencing. 99% of the country would get behind a logical solution to this problem if a logical solution were to be presented.

There seems to be policing bias towards blacks. That seems logical as blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime.

I’m unconvinced there’s a true medical bias if all aspects of individuals class were to be properly factored into the data.

Predatory lending is not an example of racism even if it disproportionately effects black people. Drug dealers in poor black neighborhoods are likely not racist, that’s where they have a proven customer base.

Voter purging is not racist even if it disproportionately effects black people. Pure politics.
 
Goddamn! Being black has perks and privileges!

I demand an end to Black Privilege! It's racist!
 
yup. Tarantino’s “uncle” told Quentin that fake tale when he was 10 year old and Quentin believed it ever since.

But the reality is Sicily was a Viking colony for a while and that was why the blonde/blue eyed DNA was added to the dark haired olive skinned natives. And you see it in guys like old blue eyed Frank Sinatra
The Norman's invaded and added to the genetics as well. But that's not quite like being a Viking Colony as they were in fact a colony started by the decendents of Viking colony who'd long integrated French women into their society. Norman's were their own thing by then. It is an interesting parallel between the south and England though.

There has also been a lot of population movement within the Italic peninsula since Roman times. Nothing too shocking about a dark or light southerner really. But still all are genetically Mediterranean Caucasians.

@Bacco can probably expand with a better and modern picture.
 
The Norman's invaded and added to the genetics as well. But that's not quite like being a Viking Colony as they were in fact a colony started by the decendents of Viking colony who'd long integrated French women into their society. Norman's were their own thing by then. It is an interesting parallel between the south and England though.

There has also been a lot of population movement within the Italic peninsula since Roman times. Nothing too shocking about a dark or light southerner really. But still all are genetically Mediterranean Caucasians.

@Bacco can probably expand with a better and modern picture.

The Franks had light brown hair, so Normans would still have been blond or dark blond/light brown.
 
If white people are living on easy street, proped up on the backs of minorities, why do these clowns keep trying to act black?
 
Does anyone remember the Indian guy pretending to be Black ? Apparently hes Mindy Kalings bro




White Privilege was such a bad thing.

It was so bad that it helped "white" people get a job or get into a school. People got their position because they were "white".

Fucking White Privilege



We should fix it... But how??


Ah yes, let's implement Black Privilege!


We've done a complete about-face.
Two wrongs now make a right. What a strange world we are living in now.
 
Gerrymandering is pure politics. Nothing to do with racism.

Blacks do seem to be treated unfairly as it relates to sentencing. 99% of the country would get behind a logical solution to this problem if a logical solution were to be presented.

There seems to be policing bias towards blacks. That seems logical as blacks commit a disproportionate amount of crime.

I’m unconvinced there’s a true medical bias if all aspects of individuals class were to be properly factored into the data.

Predatory lending is not an example of racism even if it disproportionately effects black people. Drug dealers in poor black neighborhoods are likely not racist, that’s where they have a proven customer base.

Voter purging is not racist even if it disproportionately effects black people. Pure politics.

The studies I brought forth showed gerrymandering that disproportionately affects blacks. They show literally the opposite of your assessment.

A solution was fabricated for sentencing biases towards blacks. Then Trump had Sessions dismantle it and call for the harshest mandatory sentences possible. And since black people are sentenced to longer rates for the same crime as whites, even when with similar records? There you go.

Blacks commit more crimes due to disproportionate poverty. They are also arrested for drugs far more than whites, despite carrying at similar rates. They're stopped much more by cops, detained longer by cops. It goes on and on.

If you can't see the medical bias, actually read the studies.

On predatory lending, those studies pertained to race, specifically what you don't see as being a problem. Weird.

Same goes for voter purging.

It's weird you don't see the racism when these policies specifically hurt black people.

You start out in 1954 by saying, “:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:.” By 1968 you can’t say “:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:, :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:.”
 
So harsher penalties for crimes effect black communities more. Why is that, you think?


Like I said, I did read some of them. You evidently don't have the capacity to read an entire post before responding to it.



So none of these are policies written to exclusively target black people. They target crime and you'd rather taker the cowards way out and say more black people get locked up because of racism, rather than the higher rate of crime in black communities. Again, this is a specific you avoid because it smashes your vague notion that America and its police are racist. You say Sessions rolled back police reform because of racism, but don't want to acknowledge that some of them were ripe for abuse by civil rights lawyers. Policies that were set up in many large cities where the majority of the police force are people of color, but that's another fact you don't like to acknowledge either.
So I'm not going to bother asking for the specific policies again, because it's clear your argument exists in vague talking points. Once again, break down your argument into specifics and you fall to pieces. You didn't break the mold, son. All you did was bitch that there is accountability in life.

You asked for policies. I listed specific racial policies the Obama admin had set up to tackle the disparities I spoke of.

Trump had Sessions dismantle them and institute policies that hurt blacks disproportionately. You haven't provided any rationale for the Sessions attacks on racial policing reform, and play coy on the obvious Atwater reasoning at play.

Don't cry when specific policies are brought forth, ma'am. Simply saying facts you can't read are vague bullshit mentions, it's pathetic.
 
Back
Top