GSP could beat people standing and GSP could beat people by dominating them on the ground.
As you said, he faced a lot tougher competition. He also has beaten everybody he's fought, With only 2 losses. I'd say if you just go by legacy GSP is much better. But who's really to know? Greatest fighter is such a subjective thing with so many factors.
Georges unwillingness to finish off opponents and to just be content to jabbing and rassling is probably why he'll never get my vote for GOAT.
Both, Anderson is the greatest fighter to grace MMA, not just the UFC.
Meh. I know that's why a lot of people think that rules him out, but I don't see why people think finishes matter so much personally.
He was an extremely dominant fighter who stopped getting as many finishes after his ACL tear, but he still managed to dominate his division for years after that surgery. He was the definitive mixed martial artist, having a completely well rounded skill set.
Damn Zuffa, if you are gonna create threads to hype up the PPV tonight, at least pick a topic that doesnt have several posts on the first page already. Should merge this with the other Anderson GOAT argument threads.
GSP is great, especially for people who got to see him dominate. The question is, are his performances great enough to be revisited by the next generation of fans who never saw him. Most of these fans will be watching the fighter of their eras, if they are going to look back, they are going to want a reason. That is why the highlight reels and finishes are important, they live on forever and get revisited by future generations. It takes 25 minutes to truly appreciate GSP's dominance for one fight. You can watch an entire highlight reel for both Fedor or Anderson in less than 25. So if we are talking about immortality, which is pretty much what GOAT status is, you've got to have performances that will live on forever. Like Anderson going Matrix on Forrest.