Americans Support Restriction on Abortions

Lord Coke

Silver Belt
@Silver
Joined
Aug 18, 2003
Messages
10,789
Reaction score
13,458
We haven't had a abortion thread in a long time and I came across this article that I found interesting. I personally find abortion to be unsettling. I don't believe it should be legal and I believe that the current structure of the laws to be an attack on both the rights of fathers and parents. It appears that I am not alone. There is also a federalism issue here. If a majority of the people believe reasonable restrictions on abortion are important for public safety who are 5 unelected lawyers to say otherwise?

http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/entry/13/29633
It hasn’t even been a month since the Supreme Court handed down a decision many saw as a massive setback for the pro-life movement. But new data shows that it’s the supporters of legal abortion, not pro-lifers, who face an uncertain future. PR Newswire reports that the Catholic organization, the Knights of Columbus, conducted a scientific survey of a thousand Americans, 18 and over. And the results were stunning.

Although around half of Americans still call themselves “pro-choice,” seventy-eight percent—nearly eight in ten in this country—support substantial restrictions on abortion. It turns out not all Americans who call themselves “pro-choice” take the extreme position that abortion should be legal at any stage of pregnancy for any reason.

And the younger the survey participant, the less pro-choice they become. A similar study by Students for Life of America found that just seventeen percent of millennials support anything-goes abortion. Most, it turns out, want abortion heavily regulated and restricted to the earliest stages of pregnancy. In fact, an astonishing sixty-two percent of those who describe themselves as “pro-choice” believe abortion should be banned after the first trimester!

But it gets even more interesting and relevant to current debates. The study also found that over sixty percent of Americans oppose taxpayer funding for abortions, and nearly eight in ten want abortion clinics held to the same standard as other outpatient surgery centers—a rule the U.S. Supreme Court just struck down in Texas. And speaking of the Supreme Court, seventy percent of those surveyed say doctors who perform abortions should be required to have hospital admitting privileges—another Texas requirement declared unconstitutional by the Court. And most remarkably, Americans agree by a margin of 20 percent that religious healthcare providers should not be forced to perform abortions against their deeply-held beliefs.

daily_commentary_07_29_16.jpg
Let’s be clear about something: This doesn’t amount to a pro-life revolution. Far too many Americans still think abortion should be legal at least in some cases—a position those of us who believe life begins at conception find inconsistent and unbearable. The overall goal of the pro-life movement is not that abortion becomes illegal; we want to persuade hearts and minds so that it becomes unthinkable.

Still, what this study does show is how profoundly out of touch many of our judges and lawmakers are with the American public. Liberals on the Supreme Court and elsewhere are basically keeping unrestricted abortion on “life support” in this country. The overwhelming majority of “we, the people,” favor cracking down on the practice.

But what about the rest of the world? The Left loves to tout Western Europe as a model for social democracy and progress. But as Cassy Fiano explains in a terrific video at Prager University, abortion laws in the United States are some of the most liberal in the world! Throughout Europe, where such laws were democratically-enacted rather than imposed by a court, abortion is widely restricted to the first trimester of pregnancy.

In Germany, Denmark, Belgium, and France, abortions after 12 weeks are virtually illegal. Waiting periods and parental consent requirements for minors are common. These kinds of laws raise cries of “theocracy!” in the United States. But they’re the democratically-enacted norm in much of famously secular Europe.

So what does all this mean? Though we still have a lot of work to do, the cultural winds are fair. Make no mistake: The Supreme Court’s recent edict striking down common-sense safety regulations on the abortion industry is an act of extremism.

Four decades of peering into the womb have forced most Americans to rethink abortion. Those on the bench and elsewhere who refuse to listen are getting lonely. And that’s why now is the time to press hard for change.
 
Liberals want to ban guns which is in the constitution but don't you dare try to put restrictions on abortions
 
Yeah, this is pretty normal. Ask your average pro-choicer if they think late third trimester abortions are cool and mist will say they don't want them legal. Ask them if they think abortions should be paid for by the state or if they should be done with no cool off period and opinions will vary.

The one thing that I find consistent is that these people who all have their personal stances on how abortion should be limited,restricted, offered, and paid for,all tend to think people who hold different stances on these things hate women or some such.
 
I'm pro-choice, but I think there should be restriction on abortions. Late term abortion should not be happening. In fact, I think abortion should be limited to the first trimester.
 
There is also a federalism issue here. If a majority of the people believe reasonable restrictions on abortion are important for public safety who are 5 unelected lawyers to say otherwise?
Have you read the constitution? Have you read the Federalists papers? I can't imagine that you have for you to write something like that.

Oh wait, you're a lawyer. That makes your post so much worse.
 
Have BLM activists targeted Planned Parenthood that more or less was founded in order to decrease the black population?
 
Liberals want to ban guns which is in the constitution but don't you dare try to put restrictions on abortions

Liberals don't want to ban guns you Fox News regurgitating mouth breather. We want to stop people who shouldn't have guns from getting them to kill people like you and me. We also are not for abortion, we just believe a woman's right to choose is the most important thing. I'm all for restrictions on abortion after a certain time.
 
This is somewhat tickling.

The Supreme Court’s recent edict striking down common-sense safety regulations on the abortion industry is an act of extremism.
 
Liberals don't want to ban guns you Fox News regurgitating mouth breather. We want to stop people who shouldn't have guns from getting them to kill people like you and me. We also are not for abortion, we just believe a woman's right to choose is the most important thing. I'm all for restrictions on abortion after a certain time.
Then stop supporting people like Diane Feinstein.
 
I really wish they were banned after the first trimester. By then the fetus has a heartbeat, can blink its eyes, has arms and legs, some sort of a nervous system, etc. A common sense belief not based on religious mumbo jumbo.
 
Liberals don't want to ban guns you Fox News regurgitating mouth breather. We want to stop people who shouldn't have guns from getting them to kill people like you and me. We also are not for abortion, we just believe a woman's right to choose is the most important thing. I'm all for restrictions on abortion after a certain time.



And we want you to stop bringing those people into the country, also


 
I'm pro-choice, but I think there should be restriction on abortions. Late term abortion should not be happening. In fact, I think abortion should be limited to the first trimester.

Wow... Is it freedom that you hate, or women? So which state are you voting for Trump from?
 
I really wish they were banned after the first trimester. By then the fetus has a heartbeat, can blink its eyes, has arms and legs, some sort of a nervous system, etc. A common sense belief not based on religious mumbo jumbo.
What's special about day 91 versus day 89?
I don't have a particular problem with putting some time period after which abortion becomes restrictive (not outright banned, just more restrictive). That's actually pretty common in many western countries. The difference between us and those countries, however, is that in much of our country getting an abortion is very difficult and expensive. Placing a particularly restrictive deadline when many women may not realize they're pregnant until half way through the first trimester then become quite problematic.
 
If a majority of the people believe reasonable restrictions on abortion are important for public safety who are 5 unelected lawyers to say otherwise

because you're wrong. you don't care at all about this issue from the woman's perspective, or from a legal perspective. you don't care about privacy rights, women's rights, or constitutional rights.

so why is someone like you more qualified to rule on what is or is not a constitutional right than our own supreme court? the answer - you aren't.

it would also be laughable to see an uneducated half wit discuss this with a supreme court justice. the uneducated masses don't get to determine what our rights are - the constitution and the supreme court do. and for good reason, because the masses are fucking stupid and leaving decisions up to the mob is one of the greatest checks we developed as a country.
 
What's special about day 91 versus day 89?
I don't have a particular problem with putting some time period after which abortion becomes restrictive (not outright banned, just more restrictive). That's actually pretty common in many western countries. The difference between us and those countries, however, is that in much of our country getting an abortion is very difficult and expensive. Placing a particularly restrictive deadline when many women may not realize they're pregnant until half way through the first trimester then become quite problematic.
I don't necessarily disagree but at a certain point it's no longer just their body as they like to say.
I also understand why many on the left won't give an inch on abortion because so many people on the right will take on a mile. It's basically their version of gun control.
 
I wonder if we ever will get to a period of men's rights regarding abortion. It takes two to tango but only one person gets to decide on the fate of the child. there seems to be something wrong about that.

On one hand a female doesn't want to carry the baby for 9 months however the father may want to love the baby/child/teen/adult for the next 50 years.

Im pro choice. First trimester only, after that, you're just an asshole.
 
Back
Top