True, I certainly don't think constantly looking for someone to be pissed off at is helpful. I don't think they're going to pull themselves out without extra help, and I don't think extra help is coming. So we'll continue to see the best, brightst, and luckiest make it out.
I'm slightly more optimistic and believe that time and immigration heal all wounds. I say it in plenty of threads - immigrant black populations achieve academically and economically right in line with immigrant Asians (the ethnic group commonly pointed to as evidence of meritocratic outcomes). So more immigrants will mean better black statistics, given enough time, especially when coupled with the changes already occurring within black America.
And because I can never go long without poking at the Asian American piñata that some Americans hold up to shield themselves from acknowledging the long term racial effects of Jim Crow and segregation (don't worry, I've got 1 Chinese great-grandparent so I'm allowed to go there
)...
I find the constant reference to Asian immigrant success while ignoring black immigrant success part and parcel of the same mentality that I referenced previously.
The mantra, that Asian American success is reflective of intrinsic Asian character/cultural/genetic differences, while choosing to ignore that most Asian countries are absolutely horrible places to live unless you're already privileged or smart enough to get out. It's part of the necessary fiction. Divorcing Asian American success from
Asia's general failures to thrive allows poor white America to say that "Asians and Asian culture are just better" therefore their failure to equal Asian success isn't their fault but a product of the superior Asian worldview. That they never bother to apply this to Nigerians or Kenyans or Ghanians who are similarly accomplished once they get to the U.S., ie. the superior African worldview, lol, is because the ideological issue isn't really about black cultural failings but about maintaining some argument for their failed social standing relative to others.
Successful Africans are disregarded so that they can't contradict the race argument about intrinsic black failings, successful Asians are separated from their larger national failings so that they can support the concept that some races/cultures are just better than others. Both of these choices allow lower income white America to prop up the concept that they must be intrinsically better than at least one race in the U.S. Hence that they remain generational poor or relatively unaccomplished isn't really their individual failures but can be placed at the feet of unalterable race/culture elements.
Not many people are going to care but there's some fascinating parallels to this in the Haitian revolution. Rich whites generally held the highest social standing but it was poor whites who harbored the most resentment for wealthy free blacks (of which Haiti had plenty, many of whom owned slaves) and were some of the strongest supporters for apartheid policy even though it didn't economically benefit them. For them, the issue was social standing and racial discrimination gave them the strongest platform to more of it.