Am I the only one who sees the truth?

true_fan

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
16,308
Reaction score
7,761
I mean by that for example, Jones lost to Reyes, Tony lost to RDA because eye gouge is cheating and so on! Am I the only one who sees in the matrix and not what the judges say?
 
Yep and the Chinese Virus is a hoax to install 5G towers.
 
Most people think Jones lost to Reyes.....

Not exactly a hot take.....
 
I mean by that for example, Jones lost to Reyes, Tony lost to RDA because eye gouge is cheating and so on! Am I the only one who sees in the matrix and not what the judges say?

It's arguable Reyes won if you give him the first three rounds. But that's the best case scenario for him if you score every close round his way, Jones didn't need you to score every close round his way to win and most would score it 3-2 Jones. Reyes gets props for being the first to outstrike Jones but that doesn't tell the whole story even on the feet, Jones got Reyes down a few times etc and the fighter who loses rounds 4 and 5 of a championship fight probably can't claim they were robbed cause they were in worse shape by the end.

No opponent has outfought Jones. Santos arguably went up 2-0 but he was finished by the end probably lost 4-1. Gus was about to go up 3-1 even 4-0 if you gave Gus the first three before those elbows...then got dominated in the championship rounds. None of those guys can really complain because the way a fight would be settled IRL(last man standing) they were all clearly the loser and were looking for a very favorable interpretation of the rules to call themselves the winner.

All these guys benefited from judges hatred of 10-10, 10-8 rounds. If judges actually used these both favor Jones as it'd take away their credit for narrowly winning close rounds and Jones could get more credit for a dominant round.

RDA's picture is next to the word gatekeeper in the dictionary dominating him is basically a rite of passage in 155/170. You are the only one who saw that fight that way.
 
You might wanna check your numbers man

Yes a judge gave it to Santos that was an outlier opinion based on the stats, two judges giving the fourth to Santos puzzled me as well. Jones haters point to it cause they are biased and that was the first time a judge had Jones losing but Reyes and Gus had better cases for winning their fights. Santos clearly won the first and was winning the second before the injury probably lost it. The last 3 rounds should have all went to Jones. 48-47 or 49-46.

Jones outstruck Santos landing a higher percentage in the last four rounds(this fight was on the feet), only round he arguably won was the second where the injury occured but he was winning prior. Only round Santos clearly won is the first. Yes 2 judges gave Santos round 4 and 1 gave him round 5 those are confusing scores. Maybe they were giving him credit for doing so well with a bum knee after giving Jones the second? I don't know but we also know these people aren't the best qualified people to judge MMA in the world they have these positions through the SAC's.

I had the fight 4-1 Jones( several media members did too including the two Sherdog scorecards), 3-2 Jones IMO was a rational opinion but the way the 2 official judges got to 3-2 Jones made no sense to me and the judge who scored the fight 3-2 Santos should be professionally evaluated. The SAC's are used to boxing and I get how they adjust their criteria to MMA is going to differ but this fight was almost entirely on the feet and makes no sense from a boxing perspective either.
 
Jones beat Reyes, and I’m not a Jones fan. I was cheering for Reyes. But he didn’t win. Sorry.
 
the 2nd amendment shall not be infringed

but ya'll bitches making a good argument for an internet license. i ain't even playing wit u.
 
rawImage.jpg
 
Back
Top