- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,833
- Reaction score
- 5,469
Born 85' and have no tattoos. Not that I care if people have them, I just never got any myself.
Nobody is judging. I’m not, and I tried to make that clear. As I said, live and let live. I knew somebody would get offended by this post.
There’s a hilarious satire page on FB that equates all tattoos to pure evil, and my god, the comments from the people who don’t realize that its very obviously a spoof page. People take it so personal.
I’ve found a lot of “tattoo” people to have very thin skin when it comes to ink, ironically.
It’s ok to admit that covering ur body with tattoos that u think are cool, but then 20 yrs later, u look at it and think, what a dud.
I have one tattoo I got when I was 17. Its my dad's initials on my arm.
I dont regret it, but i wish I would have got it done correctly instead of in some random Mexican kids trailer home. Whatever.
And yes I feel like I'm in the minority not being covered in ink. Even though I do have one, sometimes I forget it's even there. I'll look at my arm and surprise myself.
Fighter Kevin Lee? Or Plastic Surgeon Kevin Lee?I saw Kevin Lee's head one and WTF was he thinking?
Ah shitI think you are actually in the majority with one. Sorry buddy.
Born ‘81... Anyone else kind of feel like they’re so glad they never got any tattoos?
I rarely enjoy other people’s tattoos.
You're Gen X by certain definitions. No, you're not in the minority among our batch. If you were 10-15 years younger you'd definitely be in the minority.Born ‘81... Anyone else kind of feel like they’re so glad they never got any tattoos?
I rarely enjoy other people’s tattoos.
Ah shit
I'll see myself out
You're Gen X by certain definitions. No, you're not in the minority among our batch. If you were 10-15 years younger you'd definitely be in the minority.
It's disgusting. Branding is for livestock.
All the more sensible definitions, I'd estimate, but you never get 100% agreement with these informal, amorphously-defined terms. Some cut it off as early as '79. Some cut it off as late as '84.Isn't '81 generation X by all possible definitions? I am '80 and remember when I was younger generation X is all they called people my age. Now I am 40 so I am just an old fuck. And proud to be one btw.
And yes most people around my age I know, and even people down to like 30 Y-O don't have tats.
All the more sensible definitions, I'd estimate, but you never get 100% agreement with these informal, amorphously-defined terms. Some cut it off as early as '79. Some cut it off as late as '84.
I always preferred this. We define 18 as legally adult. "Millennials" are the last generation who were not adults before the turn of the Millennium. Thus, it must start at least as late as '83. The oldest of this group would have still been mostly minors when 9/11 happened which marks a shift in global politics and alliances as well as the world wars or civil rights revolutions from previous generations. Millennials are the Children of the Towers.
No, a Millennial could be born as early as '82 (not '83, excuse me, I was buffering like one would with a school year, but that isn't required here). A Gen X would be cut off there, and '81 would be the latest birth date for one of them.Hmmm according to that definition a millenial can be born in '80? That is a very strict definition of generation X.
All the more sensible definitions, I'd estimate, but you never get 100% agreement with these informal, amorphously-defined terms. Some cut it off as early as '79. Some cut it off as late as '84.
I always preferred this. We define 18 as legally adult. "Millennials" are the last generation who were not adults before the turn of the Millennium. Thus, it must start at least as late as '83. The oldest of this group would have still been mostly minors when 9/11 happened which marks a shift in global politics and alliances as well as the world wars or civil rights revolutions from previous generations. Millennials are the Children of the Towers.
Yes, agreed, I definitely think the existence of smartphones should be the defining calibrator for the subsequent generation that follows Millennials (however that warps the generational window we try to apportion evenly). People who grew up never knowing a world without smartphones....it's breaks my head when I try to think about how they see the world.BTW I think the biggest cut off of our lifetime will likely be around '95. People born after that are the first ones to grow up (at least during their teen years) with social media and smartphones.
You just called me a cow, didn't you? howdareyou.gifYou're Gen X by certain definitions. No, you're not in the minority among our batch. If you were 10-15 years younger you'd definitely be in the minority.
It's disgusting. Branding is for livestock.
Never you, cuffs. I'm talking about everyone else.You just called me a cow, didn't you? howdareyou.gif