International Almost 300m people at risk of death through starvation

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
@Silver
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
10,474
Reaction score
13,214
Mark Townsend

Aid cuts, conflict, climate and economic shocks contribute to sixth consecutive rise in numbers facing ‘high levels of food insecurity’

Acute food insecurity continues to rise at an alarming rate, with almost 300 million people at risk of death through starvation, new analysis reveals.

Escalating conflict and cuts to humanitarian aid along with climate and economic shocks forced an additional 13.7 million people into chronic food insecurity last year.

It is the sixth consecutive year that the number of people facing “high levels of acute food insecurity” has risen, reaching 295.3 million according to the latest Global Report on Food Crises (GRFC).

The figure represents almost a quarter – 22.6% – of the population of 53 countries analysed by GRFC experts.

“Intensifying conflict, increasing geopolitical tensions, global economic uncertainty and profound funding cuts are deepening acute food insecurity,” the report said.

People facing the most chronic lack of food – as categorised by the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) – more than doubled last year.

5472.jpg

More than 95% of them lived in the Gaza Strip or Sudan, although Haiti, Mali and South Sudan had significant populations suffering similar food shortages.

The category – described as “catastrophe” by the IPC – is characterised by starvation, death, destitution and high rates of acute malnutrition.

In Sudan, the worsening civil war led to famine being officially declared with more than 24 million facing acute food insecurity.

Conditions also deteriorated within the Gaza Strip, with experts last year stating that half the population was projected to be suffering the IPC’s “catastrophe” scenario.

“Following the closure of all crossings into the Gaza Strip in early March, and the collapse of the two-month ceasefire, food access has been severely restricted,” the report said.

The warnings were corroborated on Monday when the latest report by the IPC said Gaza’s population of about 2.1 million Palestinians was at “critical risk” of famine as the Israeli blockade on humanitarian aid continued.

The GRFC experts identified worsening food security in 19 countries, largely fuelled by conflicts such as in Myanmar, Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

images

Such insecurity was, they said, aggravated by the climate crisis with worsening drought conditions expected in parts of Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia as well as Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The abrupt termination of funding this year, particularly USAID, has also dismantled nutrition services to more than 14 million children in states such as Sudan, Yemen and Haiti, leaving them vulnerable to severe malnutrition and death.

Even before the funding cuts, nutrition crises were detected in almost half the 53 countries examined in the GRFC report.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-...-through-starvation-global-report-food-crises
 
Eating is for pussies.
Consider the many more millions of kids who are malnourished and growing up with diminished capacity in all sorts of ways as a result. Follow that with a thought for the criticisms people level at immigrants.

As they say, the cruelty is the point.
 
If you live in an area where people are starving, we must address hard truths as well as help out when possible. But the truth is millions of Americans are starving as well. 13.5% of Americans do not have food security. 18 million households. But we should worry about Gaza? Why doesn't Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iran help Gaza? Amazing we can't help our own, and yet fund other nations that wish death upon us. And I am always amazed that the nations with the least food seem to populate the most.
 
And I am always amazed that the nations with the least food seem to populate the most.

Children have long been the primary form of investment for those living in extreme scarcity.

Have a child and in 8 years they can start helping, by 12 largely self sufficient, at 15 productive for a couple of decades. All depending on ability to find work to do of course.
 
Children have long been the primary form of investment for those living in extreme scarcity.

Have a child and in 8 years they can start helping, by 12 largely self sufficient, at 15 productive for a couple of decades. All depending on ability to find work to do of course.
Goes against every fiber of my being. I love kids and wanted as many as I could. But I could responsibly afford 2. Now they are older and we are more fiscally successful, we may adopt or foster. But I remember those videos we watched of kids starving in Africa, and I remember as a kid thinking "Why are they having these kids with no food just to lay there covered in flies". I knew as a kid that was fucked up.
 
Goes against every fiber of my being. I love kids and wanted as many as I could. But I could responsibly afford 2. Now they are older and we are more fiscally successful, we may adopt or foster. But I remember those videos we watched of kids starving in Africa, and I remember as a kid thinking "Why are they having these kids with no food just to lay there covered in flies". I knew as a kid that was fucked up.
It makes no sense on a overview perspective but whenviewed from an individual perspective its perfectly logical.

Say you're a family of 4, your neighbours like your land and are a family of 8. Which family did more to protect their family?

In an organised society with enforced laws, more kids = less opportunity for each kid. In less organised society, more kids = larger family = increased safety.
 
Consider the many more millions of kids who are malnourished and growing up with diminished capacity in all sorts of ways as a result. Follow that with a thought for the criticisms people level at immigrants.

As they say, the cruelty is the point.
You want abortions with no restrictions, but here you’re gonna pretend you give a shit about children, stfu!
 
You want abortions with no restrictions, but here you’re gonna pretend you give a shit about children, stfu!
Show me where I ever made a post here saying what I want when it comes to abortions or fuck off. And fuck you if you think it's not possible to have empathy for people you don't know.

Regardless, I don't have kids, never wanted kids, married a woman who also never wanted kids. It's none of my business. It's up to the mother under the advice of medical professionals. Or in this case, her legal representatives.
 
Show me where I ever made a post here saying what I want when it comes to abortions or fuck off.

Regardless, I don't have kids, never wanted kids, married a woman who also never wanted kids. It's none of my business. It's up to the mother. Or in this case, her legal representatives.
I’m not gonna go digging through your posts, say it now if you have the balls, are you saying you’re against a woman’s right to choose?
 
So a baby getting killed next-door is none of your business, but a baby dying on the other side of the planet is your business?
Well, if there's one thing we can all count on, it's for you to misrepresent every position your confirmation bias tells you to. Way to go.
 
Well, if there's one thing we can all count on, it's for you to misrepresent every position your confirmation bias tells you to. Way to go.
No, I’m just replying to exactly what you said, that it’s none of your business if the lady next-door kills her baby. Those were your words, not mine, that it’s none of your business.
 
No, I’m just replying to exactly what you said, that it’s none of your business if the lady next-door kills her baby. Those were your words, not mine, that it’s none of your business.
Well, if there's one thing we can all count on, it's for you to misrepresent every position your confirmation bias tells you to. Way to go.
 
If you live in an area where people are starving, we must address hard truths as well as help out when possible. But the truth is millions of Americans are starving as well. 13.5% of Americans do not have food security. 18 million households. But we should worry about Gaza? Why doesn't Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iran help Gaza? Amazing we can't help our own, and yet fund other nations that wish death upon us. And I am always amazed that the nations with the least food seem to populate the most.

Oh theres been plenty of aid ready to go for gaza...

Its been blocked for a few months.

Egypt
Jordan


Syria? Rough ask as they in war but


Lebannon
 
Back
Top