Good work, TS. Always quality stuff and I appreciate the effort. Funaki at the 7 spot on LHW is surprising but I guess he got the head-start with Pancrase back in the day
Thanks.Good list, probably lots of work. I agree with most (or see the reason why). Miletich at #22 is a rough look tho.
It is there. You can see topRkP4P and topRkCtg
that's a top ranking, I mean a peak ATT rating
ATT (All Time Total) score is not changing radically and is mostly going up. So there are no peeks.
Current Score (CS) can have a lot of peeks.
In another thread Distinction between All Time Ranking and Current Ranking
I explained the differences between two main scores that are calculated for each fighter - All Time Total and Current Score.
All Time Total score (ATT) is a calculated value that describes fighter's achievements in his overall MMA career.
ATT number is used to determine fighter's position on the All Time ranking list.
This value rarely goes down. When fighter's career is finished this number stays unchanged.
Right now, maximum ATT value is just below 2400.
Current Score (CS) is calculated each week to describe fighter's results at that point in time.
This is very volatile and time sensitive number. More recent fights are valued more. Long inactivity decreases this score.
In theory, CurrScore value can go over 1000 points, but no fighter since 1993 was able to go over 1000.
To see how those two numbers change in time here are career numbers for Fedor Emelianenko.
Thanks for the info, how about peak CS then? Is it so volatile that it has no meaning, or would it?
Wsnderlei #2 all time at lhw is most FUNNIEST AND RIDICULOUS placing ive ever seen.....EVA
I Stopped there.
Just one mans opinion.
Great work as always
The only thing that looks weird to me is that Marlon Moraes is not even top 30 in the BW List
Dudu Dantas is pretty low too, even more than Galvao, kinda crazy
i had few problem with WW and BW.
no wonderboy and no Marlon moraes.
awesome list though, good job.
We are developing this system since 2009. Because all work is voluntary, people are constantly coming and leaving.How many people work on these lists? Have you ever tried to shop the process to a website or anything? Even if it hasn't been properly vetted I don't think I've ever seen close to this amount of effort put into compiling an all-time objective ranking system like this.
You are exactly right, MMA sample (fights per year) is too small. We tried ELO in 2008/2009, but it didn’t work.Just out of curiosity (I haven't examined your method) did you consider a retrospectively applied ELO system? Sample sizes too small?