- Joined
- Oct 16, 2015
- Messages
- 5,971
- Reaction score
- 901
thanks for the technical correction, and I know you weren't trying to be a smart ass. I also know you understood my point, basically that gsp has more votes for him than the others in the list.
Actually its not just a technical correction or being a smart ass, there's a real difference between plurality and majority. It comes up regularly in politics -- for instance if there are three people running for an office in a first-past-the-post system its possible (and happens from time to time) that the division is 40%-30%-30%, and the winner gets in with less than even half the people voting for them. And they still talk about mandates despite the fact that the majority of voters didn't want them.
It comes up all the time in engineering applications -- sometimes along the lines of the best bid gets 15% of the votes and the other 85% are split among 20 or so other candidates. The one with 15% did the best, but is still a long way from being the choice that everyone is happy with.
In this case, GSP has a third of the votes. That's better than anyone else, but its a long way from a majority -- again, two times as many people think someone else is the GOAT (though they can't agree on who) than think he is the GOAT.
And I think that's actually a good sign. Is there any agreement on what's the best book? The best movie? The best music? The best sport? The best flavor of ice-cream? No, because there are a lot of good options. The fact that there's nothing like agreement on who's the GOAT of MMA is a sign that there are several very good fighters, which is good for MMA. The only time everyone agrees on the best of anything is when its something almost no one does so there's no competition.