- Joined
- May 3, 2010
- Messages
- 14,531
- Reaction score
- 0
Jesus Christ, Marie.
Your argument is that because more people are exposed to it and can abuse it more easily, that it is more harmful? Sure, go for it.
But we both know cocaine is a more harmful drug on the individual than alchohol. By far.
If cocaine was as readily available and accessible as alcohol, the stats would be completely different. You and I both know it.
Next you'll be telling me that handguns are far more dangerous than RPG's because more people die from handguns each year.
Those are relative figures, dear, so no. And I don't know where you live, but in most places it's really easy to get a hold of coke. And no, even if it was more available, no data has shown that abuse goes up. Historically speaking, prohibition has always resulted in more problems. And if that data is too scarce for your liking, then you can't have it both ways: Then there is no evidence to say what would happen either way. And even if the problems do increase, that's still a thousand times better than letting it be in the hands of criminals making billions and all the violence that comes with it.