International Algeria now wants to join BRICS joins growing list of Nations wanting to Join anti Western

Calling it an anti-western group is out of context and far from the truth..

All the countries joining are just a bunch of opportunists who wanna better their economical situation for them it is merely about improving their economy constantly. Majority won't even view this from this camp or that camp but rather from ''how much will we increase in GDP'' How much will our country get enriched from this....
<{vega}>

Economy

Economy

Economy..

The world is just selfish and everyone just wants good things for themselves and this is basically increasing in wealth for everyone. I think the US itself could join this group down the line if it eventually picks up
 
Last edited:
Lmao the epic superpowers Algeria and Argentina are now allies and friends, oh no!!
[omg1]

Meanwhile those irrelevant dysfunctional shitholes have like 90000% inflation and change governments more often than I trim my ballsack
Change their governments how well has that worked out recently?
 
Calling it an anti-western group is out of context and far from the truth..

All the countries joining are just a bunch of opportunists who wanna better their economical situation for them it is merely about improving their economy constantly. Majority won't even view this from this camp or that camp but rather from ''how much will we increase in GDP'' How much will our country get enriched from this....
<{vega}>

Economy

Economy

Economy..

The world is just selfish and everyone just wants good things for themselves and this is basically increasing in wealth for everyone. I think the US itself could join this group down the line if it eventually picks up
Yeah but TS is a clown so
 
It’s a term created by some people at Goldman Sachs for a group of economies they thought to be the future. The two biggest members hate each other and are in the process of economic decoupling.

I assume you mean India and China? Haven't heard much news about things between them lately
 
We've seen how well Africa has done for itself for thousands of years so here's to hoping they can keep it up!
 
Trump pulled the US out of the Iran nuke deal AND the TransPacific Parternership, because he just has to undo everything Obama did, even if it is good for the US.
You’re saying the TPP would have been good for America? No one that isn’t a corporate shill believes that
 
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-713589/amp

Argentina is already approved to join. Population 47 million, tons of resources, smart population.

Countries that want in

Algeria -45 million people. Has oil, gas
Saudi Arabia - tons of crude oil. Population 35 million
Iran - Population 85 million. Tons of resources too many to name.
Turkey (rumored but unlikely)
Egypt -

"""In their current form the BRICS make up around 31.5% of world GDP when adjusted on a purchasing power parity basis. With Iran and Argentina added, this rises to 33% of world GDP. This is a huge potential trade bloc, and 33% of global GDP is certainly enough to justify a reserve currency.

But beyond this, the potential for synergies between the countries is enormous. Taken together, the expanded BRICS countries currently produce around 26% of global oil output and 50% of iron ore production used to make steel. They produce around 40% of global corn production and 46% of global wheat production. If these were all traded in the new reserve currency, it would instantly become a cornerstone of the world economy.

Screenshot-2022-06-29-at-12.29.32.png


Meanwhile, the US dollar is already sagging. At the beginning of June, the IMF released a report showing that the US dollar today makes up 59% of global reserves — a far cry from the 70% it made up in 1999. The report noted that central bank reserve managers were actively shifting their portfolios away from dollars and into non-traditional currencies.

Now imagine what that would look that if the BRICS launched its reserve currency — let’s call it the ‘BRIC’. Assume that the BRIC was held as a reserve roughly in line with the bloc’s importance in terms of global GDP and that it took a bite out of all other reserve holdings equally. The impact would look something like the chart below. As we can see, even this simple exercise shows that the BRIC would easily hold its own against the US dollar."""

https://unherd.com/thepost/the-new-brics-alliance-is-a-mortal-threat-to-the-west/
proxy-image
 
Argentina and Algeria are nazi-loving terrorist countries that should be nuked anyway.
 
Adult Literacy in Argentina is 99%

As opposed to 88% in the US
Anyone without a significant disability can learn to read. The ones who can't weren't made to. In many instances it's because they have a chaotic home life. It's not because we didn't invest enough in education. Learning to read isn't difficult.
 
Anyone without a significant disability can learn to read. The ones who can't weren't made to. In many instances it's because they have a chaotic home life. It's not because we didn't invest enough in education. Learning to read isn't difficult.
Yeah even the worst schools in the USA get more funding per student that most developed nations. Schools are basically daycare and they are failing at that as well
 
Can they also take their people away from the non-BRICS countries?
That should be a part of the deal.
 
It would have decreased China's economic power. How is that not food for the US?

Many observers have said the trade deal would have served a geopolitical purpose, namely to reduce the signatories' dependence on Chinese trade and bring the signatories closer to the United States.[21][22][23][24]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Pacific_Partnership
Yeah. Would have given some mild balancing to china. At what cost? Funny how the fact that it would have made it VERY easy to offshore to other follow cost nations, which would have killed more jobs. It was basically NAFTA all over again for US workers. Try reading past the “balance out china” bit. There’s tons more and the implications of the treaty were wide and deep
 
Anyone without a significant disability can learn to read. The ones who can't weren't made to. In many instances it's because they have a chaotic home life. It's not because we didn't invest enough in education. Learning to read isn't difficult.
Literacy in America is defined as being able to read at a 6th grade level.

A lot of American statistics look horrible in comparison to many countries because we have different standards, usually more honest and higher standards. The classic, classic one was infant mortality; we looked downright 3rd world compared to Europe but that’s because of the way we counted infant mortality.

A baby kept on life support and dying a week later was counted as infant mortality, obviously, but this was apparently not the case in many European countries. Standards may have changed but that was a big one decades ago.

To keep it apples to apples, we’d have to know how Argentina defines literacy.
 
Back
Top