You idiot, Machida landed alot more than one punch per round. He landed multiple punches and kicks, elbows, et cetera...He also threw a devestating knee that buckled Tito sending him to the ground....He didn't move back for the whole fight, he was moving side to side....Tito is great at wrestling, maybe he was moving backwards when he was suspecting a takedown, or would you rather him move forward into the takedown? God.....another Machida hater.
You probably havn't even seen the fight though, so there is no point in arguing with you.
LOL. Well let me break down some stuff first.
#1. I dont see what "Idiot" and stuff like that is all about.
#2. The "One Punch" was a sarcastic comment.
#3. I dont like Tito Ortiz. I was going for Machida.
#4. Backwards, side to side, call it w/e you want. It was movement away from Tito. Whether it was smart or not is yours and anyone else's opinion. He wasnt the aggressor in the fight.
#5. The two would stand there in fighting positions without doing anything for seconds at a time. I understand they had to be careful but come on. It was the only fight of the night when the house of 15 people was silent and/or talking about the upcomming fights of the night or other sports like Basketball and Boxing.
#6. Back to my original point. This fight was being compared to DLH vs. Mayweather last May 5th. I forgot the exact numbers but combined DLH and Mayweather hit each other with like 4-hundred punches. Far more action than Machida vs. Ortiz.
#7 I know they're two diff sports and in Boxing more punches are thrown because that is the only weapon boxers use. So I created a formula that is totally in favor of MMA in mathematics.
-But 98% of the Machida/Ortiz fight was standing and most strikes MMA fighters throw are punches.
-But for argument sake lets say its 50/50. As in 50% punches and 50% kicks. So to make it even and fair for you. That would mean to match productivity that Mayweather/DLH landed in their fight it would have to be cut in half, 150 strikes landed.
-But for argument sakes a boxing fight is longer and 12 rounds. 12X3 = 36 minutes of action while Machida and Tito has 15 minutes of "action". So lets get half of 150 strikes landed which would be 75. To compare ratio, you know? Machida and Tito didnt land 75 strikes on each other. Not even close.
#8 So now that i got technical and prob lost you. if you understand my original point is that Mayweather vs. DLH had alot more action despite it being a boxing match that didnt live up to its hype and considered boring by not just casual and MMA fans but even Boxing fans. So where does that put Machida vs. Ortiz?