Anything that can be said for Aikijutsu can be said for Aikido. The change in suffix from -jutsu to -do, has to do with a movement of an art from focusing on effectiveness to an emphasis on improving the self. For more information look up Gendai budo on wikipedia.
Based on Aikido/Aikijutsu's origins I would say it has always been more of a Budo than a bujutsu.
The reason I would not recommend either, and I feel this has been said before in both your threads, is that there is a level of realism lost when sparring is not included. Success in a fight or self defense situation is based on one's understanding of distance, timing and effective techinques. These understandings only really come about through competitive sparring which allows you to mimick a "real life" situation most accurately while keeping things safe.
Those arts which include rigerous sparring tend to have culled those techniques that don't work and produce the students who are most likely suited to succeed in a fight.
Sparring was removed from Jujutsu in the creation of Aikijutsu (if I have the mythology correct), in an attempt to remove the competitive aspect of sparring which tends to attract thugs (or Tapout wearing tattooed hicks). The emphasis in Aikido was to learn a gentle way, and in doing so improve yourself (hence it being Budo in my mind). While many of the techniques may be useful in a fighting situation, the practicing style does not help one learn to use techniques realistically. I would imagine if you did the art would become something like Judo or BJJ.