AI Software made for high accuracy in fighting scoring, says Pereira beat Ankalaev (48-47)

Did you just admit to uploading UFC copyright footage to a third party service? Oh my gosh. You're going to jail. BIG TIME!
 
SLJ.gif
 
I had it 48-47 Alex as well. It was competitive. The optics looked better with Ank moving forward the entire time but you don't score rounds on optics.
[<diva2]

If you don't score it on optics, don't score it on stats, and don't score it on damage, what the hell are you scoring it on? Ank landed nearly 50% more strikes, landed better strikes, had 100% of the control time, and was the one moving forward the whole time while Pereira was moving backwards and had multiple rounds landing 0 head strikes.
 
No one made anything to counter the points raised by AI. It's a pro plan AI which uses tools such as "heavy info check" and "prolonged 'thought' " as well as a search engine that reaches up to at least 30 credible sources, and run it over and over until giving the answer. Not for nothing, it took this model 15 minutes to give an answer... And it also comes with a sort of build in mechanism that can ""watch"" uploaded videos and access a fight beyond only stats. It's my cousin's though, it's a monthly plan which costs fucking 300 $ per month lol. Well he has money tho and as an chemical engineer in one of the most demanding companies, it aids him a lot in efficiency. The analysis power it has though is frightening, I have a chat GPT plus plan and the difference in the level of assessment is very, very noticeable...

Btw, I agree with the overall analysis by the program.... Going strict by the rulesets and being as objective as possible, there's a stronger case for 48-47 Alex Pereira. It admitted it was a tough fight to judge, but it clarified that going by the strict criteria and overall most objective analysis, Alex Pereira defeated Ankalaev.

I didn't instruct anything, I just told to do an unbiased and as accurate as it could, giving at the end its own scoring. It gave Pereira 48-47... I even argued back challenging some notions, but surprisingly, this AI didn't concede or underwent a different scorecard, it kept the same opinion...


I didn't ask about JJ vs Reyes, I couldn't use it for too long.


Ppl saying it was a clear win by Ankalaev are crazy though, considering it was razor thin and whoever won, it'd be fair. In reality, it seems there's a slightly stronger argument based on sheer objectiveness and extreme accuracy, for Pereira to have won that fight.

Which btw makes me confused as to how ppl think Pereira vs JJ or Aspinall would be a mismatch when... In a not ideal shape Pereira had a 50/50 fight vs Ankalaev, who is arguably better than Reyes... Plis4, considering Pereira can fight naturally at 245 lbs while looking mostly ripped, people who think he'd be easy prey for HW JJ simply can't think rationally. He'd be incredibly dangerous just like Tom. Tom himself said that in between JJ, Pereira and Ankalalev, he doesn't know which opponent would be a bigger nightmare for him — basically saying he thinks those 3 are within the best fighters currently....


Fans are just..... Eh, not all ofc, but many just have poor logical thinking. Ironically, they end up sounding like the trolls themselves. Sad.
 
Did you just admit to uploading UFC copyright footage to a third party service? Oh my gosh. You're going to jail. BIG TIME!
Hehe. They know me so that'd never happen (I'll leave it at that).
 
AI is artificial intelligence. Humans are real intelligence. We have experience that AI cannot account for. We actually live in the real world.
 
Pereira wanted to lose, i’ve never sim him as happy and smily as post fight. He couldnt stop smiling in the locker room. He almost didnt throw at all and still won lol. Imagine if he would have fought with the same agression as his previous 70 fights.
 
Super top secret, the pentagon are working on AI to perfectly score MMA fights but society will collapse if it's released before it's ready
Would be cool to learn a bit more about this tech/AI that TS utilized.

I guess it's top secret though?
 
You certainly would be his bitch.
A dog humping your leg doesn't mean anything about you...it's about the dog. Laughing at it is literally the healthiest reaction. You're not a "bitch" (in any sense) because an animal acts like an animal. That's like blaming someone for getting splashed by a puddle. Zero logic.

BTW -


"This isn't Ultimate Clinching Championship"
 
A dog humping your leg doesn't mean anything about you...it's about the dog. Laughing at it is literally the healthiest reaction. You're not a "bitch" (in any sense) because an animal acts like an animal. That's like blaming someone for getting splashed by a puddle. Zero logic.

BTW -


"This isn't Ultimate Clinching Championship"

I was not blaming the animal, but the person that let him do it. Being his bitch if a dog hump your leg was a joke, but I for sure will not let a dog hump my leg and laugh about it, so it is a joke with some truth in it.
 
I was not blaming the animal, but the person that let him do it. Being his bitch if a dog hump your leg was a joke, but I for sure will not let a dog hump my leg and laugh about it, so it is a joke with some truth in it.
Of course but did he some dmg? No he didnt. He's just being silly dog and u can literally laugh it off... :D
 
Was it Pereira’s “fault” he couldn’t break free? From a game-planning view, yes, as escaping the fence would’ve let him land more kicks and strikes.

Still, was that inability enough to lose the round under the unified rules? No, without visibly damaging blows or submission attempts, fence-time control sits at the bottom of the scoring hierarchy.

Ankalaev pretty much parked Pereira on the cage for roughly 4 minutes, landing a handful of shin-knees that neither staggered nor visibly hurt him.

Pereira’s lone clear “impact” was the judo-style toss right at the bell —and under the rules that one scoreable move outweighs minutes of non-damaging control . In a pure tactical sense, a fighter wants to dictate distance, not be dictated to. But under the Unified Rules, that clinch control by itself scores below any meaningful strike or submission threat even if marked as significant. Here’s how it is:

The judges aren’t marking “who controlled the fence,” they’re marking effective offense. Long stretches of non-damaging knees to the thigh or body who had no visible impact, do not outweigh even a single visibly impactful technique...
 
I'm a Peireira fan but even I thought he lost when I watched the fight. What did Peireira do to win?
This is one of those fights I think should probably be called a draw. I don't think Ankalaev deserves to win with wall and stall being the difference maker.

But with the 10 point must system, a draw sadly isn't possible.
 
This is one of those fights I think should probably be called a draw. I don't think Ankalaev deserves to win with wall and stall being the difference maker.

But with the 10 point must system, a draw sadly isn't possible.

But that's MMA rules and scoring. Then the scoring system need to change so that controlling someone against the cage without damage or attempts of submissions doesn't score. In the current rules and scoring Pereira lost that night, but he'll be back.
 
Back
Top