Advertising energy drinks and other unhealthy garbabe at sports events is morally unacceptable

I'll bite.... Yes and no. GMO is safe from a scientific perspective. The problem is when motherfeckers like Monsanto control GMO.

"safe from a scientific perspective".

As opposed to a non-scientific perspective? Either GMOs are bad for your health or they're not.

If they are safe why do you care who controls them?

Monsanto does not own every GMO, only the ones they have produced with their own funding. They are pesticide genes inserted into crops. Other private or public institutions are free to create their own GMOs.
 
This is not a freedom thing to consume whatever you want. TS isn' talking about banning that crap, drink if you want. It's about curbing the freedom of companies to lie to you as many people have no clue. Have you ever seen those mountain dew teeth? And you all end up paying for society being unhealthy. Many in this thread can't see the big picture, they associate everything having to do with regulation with lack of freedom and that is highly ignorant and shortsighted. If you feel free in a society where everyone can lie to you and get away with it, I wish you the best of luck. Government isn't always bad, it's a lie by people who do seem to think they have rights to curb rights when it comes to woman's bodies, religion, marriage etc. without seeing the irony, but I digress.

I'm asking because I honestly want to know. How are these companies lying in their advertisements? Can you point to specific examples? There are already laws that prohibit false advertisement. Likewise, companies are forced to publish certain information about their products, such as ingredients, carlories, sugar, etc.

Someone with Mountain Dew teeth gets to enjoy the benefits of their choices. Please explain how they were lied to or forced to use the product to excess?
 
I drink the sugar free energy drinks sometimes. Prob not much better.

But lol at some of the people in here. The ones crying in here are the same ones who vape, drink alcohol, eat fast food weekly.
 
Given that tobacco sponsorship of major sport events and tobacco advertisement in general is banned in most cases, why do these horrible energy drinks like Monster get a pass?

A growing number of studies are finding that products like Monster, Red Bull, and 5-Hour Energy offer a variety of health dangers with no unique benefits. The extreme acidity and high caffeine content of these beverages can cause rapid heartbeat, high blood pressure, dehydration, vomiting, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, headaches, insomnia, and even death.

I find it disgusting that these fine athletes in the UFC are holding cans of Monster in all kinds of public events and after the end of the fight too. To me that's not much better than say McGregor holding a pack of Marlboros at some public event. Young people see that, they see their idols endorsing it and then think that drinking this sort of garbage is perfectly acceptable and develop a serious caffeine addiction, exposing themselves to health risks. More and more people are like completely addicted to this crap and have to drink Monster or Red Bull daily to even function normally.

While I noticed that the American society is extremely intolerant when it comes to tobacco (which is a good thing) there seem to be some weird acceptance of garbage unhealthy drinks full of sugar like these energy drinks or Coca Cola, not to mention the unhealthy junk food which is even promoted as some sort of integral part of culture.

I think that sports shouldn't be sponsored by products that are completely against everything athletic healthy life should be about.

With regards to the young kid comment all that can be prevented with responsible & attentive parenting.
 
I'm asking because I honestly want to know. How are these companies lying in their advertisements? Can you point to specific examples? There are already laws that prohibit false advertisement. Likewise, companies are forced to publish certain information about their products, such as ingredients, carlories, sugar, etc.

Someone with Mountain Dew teeth gets to enjoy the benefits of their choices. Please explain how they were lied to or forced to use the product to excess?

Obviously people really believe Red Bull makes you fly, duh!
 
Given that tobacco sponsorship of major sport events and tobacco advertisement in general is banned in most cases, why do these horrible energy drinks like Monster get a pass?

A growing number of studies are finding that products like Monster, Red Bull, and 5-Hour Energy offer a variety of health dangers with no unique benefits. The extreme acidity and high caffeine content of these beverages can cause rapid heartbeat, high blood pressure, dehydration, vomiting, cardiac arrhythmias, seizures, headaches, insomnia, and even death.

I find it disgusting that these fine athletes in the UFC are holding cans of Monster in all kinds of public events and after the end of the fight too. To me that's not much better than say McGregor holding a pack of Marlboros at some public event. Young people see that, they see their idols endorsing it and then think that drinking this sort of garbage is perfectly acceptable and develop a serious caffeine addiction, exposing themselves to health risks. More and more people are like completely addicted to this crap and have to drink Monster or Red Bull daily to even function normally.

While I noticed that the American society is extremely intolerant when it comes to tobacco (which is a good thing) there seem to be some weird acceptance of garbage unhealthy drinks full of sugar like these energy drinks or Coca Cola, not to mention the unhealthy junk food which is even promoted as some sort of integral part of culture.

I think that sports shouldn't be sponsored by products that are completely against everything athletic healthy life should be about.

Energy drinks are not good for you, but really, c'mon now...
 
Of course not. If you have followed this thread, I have stated that my 6 and 8 year old know better than to put that poison in their bodies. That doesn't mean I don't see the barrage of advertising TARGETING my kids on a daily basis. I don't know if you have children but if you do, you know full well that they take decisions based on many things including their parents, peer pressure and what some corporation wants them to believe.

Let 'em target. Just raise your kids to be educated and responsible. If we banned everything that was dangerous in excess, we'd ban everything. The alternative is letting someone take away your freedom. No thanks.
 
they should've stuck with Dude Wipes or Condom Depot...
 
For those doubting the TS, take a spoon and put it in your sugar bowl and scoop out 37 teaspoons and dump it into a glass. That's one Red Bull. If you feel good about that...then you're a mouthbreather. Lol.

Show me the red bulls with 150 grams of sugar in a can. Try again
 

Are you seriously referencing some bullshit alternative medicine website for proof of your junk science? The FIRST product advertised on this homepage is a COLON CLEANSE. Get the fuck out of here with this bullshit.

Energy drinks are no more or less safe than caffeinated soda or coffee. Real public health agencies like the FDA have proved this with real scientific analysis over decades of time.
 
You'll notice TS totall left out the beer ads in the octagon.

Like alcoholic beverages are good for you . . .
 
Those ideas are the basis of any civilized society.

No, those ideas are the basis of any Communist/Dictatorship type of society.

"The state knows what is best for you, and you should do whatever they say and don't question it."

STFU
 
No, those ideas are the basis of any Communist/Dictatorship type of society.

"The state knows what is best for you, and you should do whatever they say and don't question it."

STFU

Well said.
 
they should've stuck with Dude Wipes

extreme_spit_take.gif


DUDE-WIPES-FLUSHABLE-WIPES-DUDE-PRODUCTS-HOME-BANNER.jpg
 
There is so much fail in just this one post.

First, you may be too stupid to decide what's good or bad for you, but that doesn't mean that the rest of us are.

Second, who are you to decide what other people should like, consume, or use?

Third, there is no 'moral' issue here. This is simply a matter of control. You want to dictate to other people based on your own perception of right and wrong.

Fourth, I am going to explain some things to you that everyone else automatically knows:
  • If you consume or use too much of something that is not good for you, you will be unhealthy
  • If you use things in moderation you generally won't have a problem
  • If you use or consume something unhealthy, that's your decision. No one else is forcing you or is to blame. Take responsibility for your own decisions.
Fifth, if you are really outraged by an advertisement, your priorities are badly skewed.

Six, and before you ask, no, I couldn't care less if they advertised tobacco, booze, energy drinks, or anything else....see the list of things you should automatically know above.

Seventh, no advertisement is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to buy, consume, or use something. If you're so weak-minded that seeing an advertisement compels you to purchase something beyond your ability to make a reasoned decision, then you need some serious help.

Finally, save your outrage something that matters. There are many people that use or consume unhealthy products to extremes and pay the health penalty. However, a spoon never made anyone fat, and tobacco companies never forced anyone to smoke. Start taking responsibility for your own decisions, and frankly, expect others to do the same.

Advertising tobacco and booze is banned in many cases precisely because your line of thinking is idiotic.

The incredibly infantile individualistic line of thinking that you supposedly shouldn't care what other people do with their bodies is idiotic and flawed. It's only popular because it's so simplistic and most people aren't extremely intelligent or lack the education and insight to understand certain things, that's why fools keep repeating this mantra.

The fact that the basis of a civilized society is a state which has a monopoly on violence and the ability to enforce its rules shows that people like you are wrong. People can't live by themselves without a certain higher authority. There are numerous bans that are made to keep protecting people from themselves and make the citizens of the state more productive which in turn enables their own well being. No society has been able to function without this. That's the reason why you can't buy heroin freely and why there are age restrictions for certain things. Your line of thinking is wrong and doesn't follow any sort of logic because if applied to the full would only lead into anarchy. It's just some infantile primitive way of seeing the world that's prevalent today precisely because people don't want to have any responsibility.

Yes, in the case that there is a certain widespread negative phenomenon in society it is my business to care what other people do with their bodies, because I have certain obligations to the community that is my nation, the community that has raised me, provided my education and has through its historic development enabled me to live in a civilized world and people who live degenerate lives are neglecting those same responsibilities. I want my people to be healthy and have meaningful and productive lives, because that's the best for my nation and the way for humanity to go forward.
 
No, those ideas are the basis of any Communist/Dictatorship type of society.

"The state knows what is best for you, and you should do whatever they say and don't question it."

STFU

I like the sort of "communism" we had in Eastern Europe 1945-1990. Vastly superior to the liberal West in many ways. I liked how there was a sense of order.
 
You realize most people reading this will be drinking monster and eating potato chips right? Anyway I side with you
 
Back
Top