But you did it in your first post, then you acted like a buttheart spoiled child in hour second one, and now this? Be consistent at least. And yeah, I think it’s useless discuting with a delusional and salty bipolar who thinks that Sdulaev made a name on just one win. Goodbye Einstein.
'More often than not' is about as tentative a statement you can possibly make without not actually saying anything at all, or saying 'it could go either way', which is really just another way of saying 'i do not have sufficient insight with regards to this matter to so confidently stake a claim'.
Proffering a viewpoint is an invitation:
why do you think that? (a small bit i provided to start with for a small comment), or,
here's why i think something else. You know the sort of exchange where each party gets some benefit or enjoyment out of it however the ultimate result relates to your initial viewpoints. However, nothing you've said so far is actually responsive too or engaging with the material. You're long on assertions and short on actually discussing. Okay, you've got an opinion... anyone can give me an opinion though. If that's the role you wish to fill i don't need you for it. There are a hundred thousand other kenji tomikis out there who i could also hear say to me 'x will beat y', or 'y will beat x'. The only thing someone needs to produce utterances relating to someone being ahead of someone else in the horse races is a mostly functional neuro-motor cortex.
Talking with a drone is not very interesting (or useful) though. What is more interesting is,
by what means does one thing come ahead of another? Is it possible for someone to come here and talk about interesting things without dragging hysterics into the mix too? I know i at least don't come to this part of sherdog because im looking forward to a round of dickwaving contests. If you would like having a conversation about things like how Snyder and Sadulaev match up, please be my guest. Elsewise, i'll be the first to do us both a favor and just not reply.
