- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Messages
- 13,269
- Reaction score
- 7,529
Well you bias is hardcore, dude
Doesnt mean sqaut beating the the former LHW champ just one fight removef from being champ?
Wrestler or not, Griffin was a strong 230lber who dragged big boys Shogun or Franklin to the ground and beat them there. Saying outclassing that guy "doenst mean squat because wasnt a wrestler" is the kind of retard shit you can only read in sherdog.
Why do you say etc? Maia and Leites were the only tittle challengers he took to a decision. What needed GSP to have a finish? Regardless if counter striker or not, he wasnt finishing them lol.
Anyways Belfort, Okami or Franklin didnt exactly lead, they took a pretty responsible approach.... yet they were still finished by Silva.
And do you say with that?
Anyways, Hendricks had also had lackluster performances vs Pierce, Kos and Condit before GSP, where he looked far from unbeatable.
Dude, isn't that like textbook shertard MMA math logic?
>Henderson also lost to Misaki and Kondo. Would Misaki and Kondo be top5 wins too? Because of the MMA math?
>Shields also very arguably lost to Okami - certainly did in terms of damage - or Maia, so following your MMA math logic they are about equally good.
I mentioned in a different post, Silva fighting at a higher division doesn't mean squat because those fights were tailor made for him. He fought Bonnar, Griffin, and Irvin. None of them are wrestlers and none of them of them have great striking. It's like how the UFC picked fights for Conor that were good style match ups for him.
Doesnt mean sqaut beating the the former LHW champ just one fight removef from being champ?
Wrestler or not, Griffin was a strong 230lber who dragged big boys Shogun or Franklin to the ground and beat them there. Saying outclassing that guy "doenst mean squat because wasnt a wrestler" is the kind of retard shit you can only read in sherdog.
I guarantee Silva wouldn't be KOing Adesanya or Romero who are also counter strikers, he needs someone to lead the fight to have a spectacular finish. That's why his fights with Maia, Cote, etc. were so boring.
.
Why do you say etc? Maia and Leites were the only tittle challengers he took to a decision. What needed GSP to have a finish? Regardless if counter striker or not, he wasnt finishing them lol.
Anyways Belfort, Okami or Franklin didnt exactly lead, they took a pretty responsible approach.... yet they were still finished by Silva.
When GSP beat Hendricks, Hendricks was destroying everyone. He was just a shell of himself after USADA. Hendricks only had 1 loss at that time.
.
And do you say with that?
Anyways, Hendricks had also had lackluster performances vs Pierce, Kos and Condit before GSP, where he looked far from unbeatable.
And when I say Shields and Fitch are better quality of opponent, isn't Hendo one of Silva's top 5 wins? Shields dominated him over 5 rounds in Strikeforce not long after he fought Silva. So Shields is at least as good of an opponent as Hendo if not better.
Dude, isn't that like textbook shertard MMA math logic?
>Henderson also lost to Misaki and Kondo. Would Misaki and Kondo be top5 wins too? Because of the MMA math?
>Shields also very arguably lost to Okami - certainly did in terms of damage - or Maia, so following your MMA math logic they are about equally good.