- Joined
- Jul 24, 2016
- Messages
- 13,235
- Reaction score
- 7,549
I agree for the most part, Silva had to fight whoever was available at the time. I just felt middleweight was weaker than welterweight. Hughes, Fitch, Shields, Penn, and Hendricks (who was looking killer at the time) is a better quality of opponent.
I also feel fighting to the age he did hurt him in most people's eyes for the GOAT discussion. Same with my favorite fighter of all time, Fedor. Whereas someone like Khabib retired with a perfect record, Jon Jones only has 1 loss which was by DQ, and GSP has 2 losses that he avenged.
I dont know if weaker...WW was the deeper division for sure, but Silva also reigned for longer and fought above his weightclass.
Not to mention Silva holds a top5 win at WW in Sakurai as well, even though its hard to rate this accomplishment in hindsight.
You say Shields or Fitch are better quality of opponent...well, if they are superior caliber of competiton than Okami or Maia - who aren't even top5 in Silva's list btw - they are so by a slight margin, about as slight as Shields controversial decisions with both Okami and Maia. I would say they are fairly close caliber of competition.
Anyways, a top win is rated by quality of opponent + quality of performance. Of course its not the same to edge a highly controverial decision (Hendricks) as finishing your opponent in a fight, even if both look as a W on paper.
Losses way past prime dont really blemish the legacy of all-time greats in my book, much less well into their 40s, whether if is Silva, Fedor or Muhammad Ali.
The only that could prevent Silva from being regarded as GOAT are PEDs, Jones, or both imo.