A pattern I just realised...

I think the pattern is more around migration into Developed Western nations.

It's a combination of economic factors and stability, as well as a staunch commitment to multiculturalism as a state ideology in these places, which requires demographics engineering to take place in order to achieve.

So the ones who set the policy internationally, actively push for the migrations.
 
So a classical racist theory that has no merit? yet people complain when called racists.

1.- Civilization started in Mesopotamia, China, India and Egypt. Only China had climates where it snows.

2.- Western civilization started in Greece and Italy.

3.- East Asian civilization was indeed created in northern China where it snows.

The pattern is simple civilizations fluorished in fertile valleys and it spread through coastal trade mainly.

Anyone who thinks like in the desert or the jungle is easy, is talking out of his ass, and for the most part northern europeans which didnt lived in fertile areas and were never conquered by the Romans were living in pretty precarious conditions.

You are talking about little cultural stuff over the last couple thousand years.. the tendencies and physical differences if people evolved over 15-20-30,000 years.
 
You are talking about little cultural stuff over the last couple thousand years.. the tendencies and physical differences if people evolved over 15-20-30,000 years.

So grecolatin civilization is a "little cultural stuff"

Right, im pretty sure the northern barbarians were about to create modern society by the time the romans educated them.
 
So a classical racist theory that has no merit? yet people complain when called racists.

1.- Civilization started in Mesopotamia, China, India and Egypt. Only China had climates where it snows.

2.- Western civilization started in Greece and Italy.

3.- East Asian civilization was indeed created in northern China where it snows.

The pattern is simple civilizations fluorished in fertile valleys and it spread through coastal trade mainly.

Anyone who thinks like in the desert or the jungle is easy, is talking out of his ass, and for the most part northern europeans which didnt lived in fertile areas and were never conquered by the Romans were living in pretty precarious conditions.

So you acknowledge geography plays a role in how a civilization develops, yet you think that harsh freezing weather and food scarcity for several months a year has no effect whatsoever on how a civilization develops.
 
So you acknowledge geography plays a role in how a civilization develops, yet you think that harsh freezing weather and food scarcity for several months a year has no effect whatsoever on how a civilization develops.

Because for the most part civilization wasnt created in cold parts?

The theory that harsh living conditions created smart men is ridiculous, deserts, cold climates and jungles for the most part are too harsh to survive that they were detrimental to civilization.

Civilization actually happened in fertile lands and strife has been a constant for mankind virtually anywhere.

Another point he was making was that its not how a civilization develops but that northeners are inherently smarter than southeners because of superior genetics of a harsher living condition.
 
Last edited:
Another point he was making was that its not how a civilization develops but that northeners are inherently smarter than southeners because of superior genetics of a harsher living condition.

Not smarter.. Adapted to different conditions.
 
no the trend is everyone tries to get out of shitty countries. You don't see Australia complaining.
 
Interesting observation. But what about westeros?
 
Interesting observation. But what about westeros?
Right? Wildlings went south.No one wants to live in the North except people who keep getting themselves killed.
 
The people of the North evolved in cold weather, and even ice-ages. Simple breeding could not allow for their survival, as in other places. They had to develop more structured societies, and work better together to make it through those long cold periods. The adaptation to those environments created good engineers, and a people who generally know how to organize a society to store enough food, and help others survive through tough times. They had to constantly wear clothes and work to survive harsh climates, so things other than dancing and penis jiggling became factors for breeding and impressing women.. Although perhaps the women secretly yearned for a time when dancing and penis jiggling to decide who breeds would return.

These are some of the factors that allowed for a part of the world that is still frozen 1/3 of the year to have the capability to feed people in places warm all year round. The people in the warm all year round places would survive without the Northerners help, however, because they are geared towards breeding to replace depleted numbers and early aged deaths; where the Northerners breed less, but needed to teach their children more engineering like skills over time to facilitate their survival, because no matter how fast you breed, the baby will die and not breed itself if it freezes immediately. These adaptations to different environments over some thousands of years describe the differences in races and certain overall propensities, with understanding that these general differences can be radically different on individual basis. The general differences led to the general differences in the organization of societies.

You're welcome.

This is pretty accurate in my opinion. Follow the equator around the globe and it's shit hole 3rd world cesspool after the next. As you move away from the equator, you find more and more industrious 1st world societies
 
Not smarter.. Adapted to different conditions.

Except its nowhere near the norm.

People from very cold areas have been nomadic people with limited civilization who fight a lot over resources, like islanders or desert people.

The current culture of northern europeans didnt originated in northern europe it originated in southern europe and the middle east.

Also why didnt native americans living in the frozen north developed advanced empires like the Mayans, Aztecs or Incas? the more food you have the more your society can be stratified and develop things that are key for scientific advancement like writing and mathematics.
 
Except its nowhere near the norm.

People from very cold areas have been nomadic people with limited civilization who fight a lot over resources, like islanders or desert people.

The current culture of northern europeans didnt originated in northern europe it originated in southern europe and the middle east.

Also why didnt native americans living in the frozen north developed advanced empires like the Mayans, Aztecs or Incas? the more food you have the more your society can be stratified and develop things that are key for scientific advancement like writing and mathematics.

The whiter people that ended up in the south, evolved in the colder climates. The further North you go, the more the genetics are to organize society in what most would consider a first world fashion. You are just denying obvious reality for your political leanings. It's all really simple adaptation to surroundings.

Those from the north would have been out-bred and lost if they were all of a sudden thrust into a tropical climate. What they were adapted to would have been less useful, and the women would have chosen the better dancers. Hiding away inside, tinkering with objects while thinking and being quiet might actually look "stupid" when everybody is walking around mostly naked, and the women are ready to go. Walking around with your ass out being loud to impress stupid young women doesn't make "first world" living conditions, as easily as other behavior patterns.
 
I've been to Greenland 2x.
They are drunks with guns. I did not see one engineer (unless he was drunk with a gun and I did not bother to ask what their job was)

Greenland is the one covered in ice and Iceland is the one covered in green right?

As Homer Simpson once said "it's funny because it's true."

;)
 
The whiter people that ended up in the south, evolved in the colder climates. The further North you go, the more the genetics are to organize society in what most would consider a first world fashion. You are just denying obvious reality for your political leanings. It's all really simple adaptation to surroundings.

Those from the north would have been out-bred and lost if they were all of a sudden thrust into a tropical climate. What they were adapted to would have been less useful, and the women would have chosen the better dancers. Hiding away inside, tinkering with objects while thinking and being quiet might actually look "stupid" when everybody is walking around mostly naked, and the women are ready to go. Walking around with your ass out being loud to impress stupid young women doesn't make "first world" living conditions, as easily as other behavior patterns.
Yeah, as you move north evolution is more apt to select for different things.

If you want to survive in extremely cold climates, you HAVE to master agriculture (unless I'm missing something here) or be really creative in survival techniques.

We have 100,000 years of untold/lost history of whites. Something was going on to survive those climates.
 
The whiter people that ended up in the south, evolved in the colder climates. The further North you go, the more the genetics are to organize society in what most would consider a first world fashion. You are just denying obvious reality for your political leanings. It's all really simple adaptation to surroundings.

Those from the north would have been out-bred and lost if they were all of a sudden thrust into a tropical climate. What they were adapted to would have been less useful, and the women would have chosen the better dancers. Hiding away inside, tinkering with objects while thinking and being quiet might actually look "stupid" when everybody is walking around mostly naked, and the women are ready to go. Walking around with your ass out being loud to impress stupid young women doesn't make "first world" living conditions, as easily as other behavior patterns.

1.- Greeks, Italians, Persians, Phoenicians, Mesopotamians and Egyptians, none of them evolved in the north, what kind of racist propaganda are you reading?

2.- Im ignoring nothing, read a little bit about germanic tribes, goths and the the such before they met the romans they were disorganized warring tribes that resemble nothing the modern societies they are now. Because harsh conditions dont make people better for civilization, they make it better at scrapping by, there is no room to develop writing, mathematics, philosophy and the such when you spend most of your time just trying to get food and defend yourself against your neighbour.


3.- Again, what stupid non-sense are you talking about? at this point i guess you are too invested into whatever racist ideology you subscribe to, so ill now say "evidence please".

Im pretty sure that if Archimedes had been born into a germanic hut instead of Syracuse he would had gone to be a great mathematician and inventor instead of dying out of hunger or from one of the countless raids they had to endure as a matter of life.
 
I lived in Brazil, went south to Uruguay, Argentina, Colombia, USA (Minnisota) now Canada. Aside from Minnisota to Canada it was a northern trend.
 
Yeah, as you move north evolution is more apt to select for different things.

If you want to survive in extremely cold climates, you HAVE to master agriculture (unless I'm missing something here) or be really creative in survival techniques.

We have 100,000 years of untold/lost history of whites. Something was going on to survive those climates.

Right, thats why the Neardenthals who had been living in Europe for 200,000 years completely displaced the invading Cro-Magnons that were just leaving Africa mrite?

Nope, Neardenthals got complete erased by the Cro-Magnons coming out of Africa.

And as i pointed out before, life was extremely harsh pretty much everywhere.
 
Right, thats why the Neardenthals who had been living in Europe for 200,000 years completely displaced the invading Cro-Magnons that were just leaving Africa mrite?

Nope, Neardenthals got complete erased by the Cro-Magnons coming out of Africa.

And as i pointed out before, life was extremely harsh pretty much everywhere.
Mostly true. Not 100,000 years, and there was interbreeding too.

There were selective pressures applied uniquely to that environment.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/neandertal_interaction_with_cro-magnons.htm
 
Mostly true. Not 100,000 years, and there was interbreeding too.

There were selective pressures applied uniquely to that environment.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/terms/neandertal_interaction_with_cro-magnons.htm

Cro-Magnon emigrated 45k years ago, and the europeans that created civilizations emigrated around 10k years ago AFTER the ice age and they brought the agricultural technologies they had developed in the middle east and north africa.

Your argument completely fails when you take into account the other branches of the Cro-Magnonr (earliest europeans) who kept the ancient ways without finding a fertile region or coming into contact with people who had developed agriculture.

Earliest Europeans didnt developed shit, it was the indo-european peoples who emigrated from the middle east after the glaciers disappeared the ones that brought civilization to the region.

If your argument was true then the American indians who lived in the northern US or Canada would had been more advanced than those that lived closed to the tropics, which they were not.

The most advanced American indians lived in Mexico, Central America and the Andes. I think only the Andes regions gets regular snow.
 
Back
Top